From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: maneesh@in.ibm.com
Cc: Thibaut VARENE <varenet@parisc-linux.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linuxraid@amcc.com,
Matt Tolentino <matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com>,
len.brown@intel.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: kobject_register needs return value checks (was: What protection does sysfs_readdir have with SMP/Preemption?)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:24:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1132759472.13395.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1132755654.13395.37.camel@localhost.localdomain>
I'm doing some tests to see what happens on a failure of setting up
something in the sysfs, and I've discovered a few areas that don't test
the return value of kobject_register. The test was due to a memory
problem in a custom kernel that showed that sysfs didn't quite handle
the error cases well.
I did the following command:
find . -name "*.c" ! -type d | xargs grep "kobject_register"
I found 27 hits. Of these:
14 - checked the return value.
1 - reference in .mod.c file /* ignore it */
3 - in comments /* ignore it */
1 - declaration of actual function /* ignore it */
1 - EXPORT_SYMBOL /* ignore it */
1 - inside a printk quote. /* ignore it */
and ...
6 - calls without checking return values.
Here are the culprits:
./drivers/acpi/scan.c: kobject_register(&device->kobj);
./drivers/firmware/efivars.c: kobject_register(&new_efivar->kobj);
./drivers/md/md.c: kobject_register(&mddev->kobj);
./drivers/parisc/pdc_stable.c: kobject_register(&entry->kobj);
./fs/partitions/check.c: kobject_register(&p->kobj);
./kernel/params.c: kobject_register(&mk->kobj);
Normally, these would not return errors, but in case they do, the kernel
should be robust enough to handle it.
I tried to CC all the maintainers of the above files.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-23 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-22 21:33 What protection does sysfs_readdir have with SMP/Preemption? Steven Rostedt
2005-11-22 21:39 ` Greg KH
2005-11-23 4:50 ` Maneesh Soni
2005-11-23 8:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-23 12:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-11-23 12:54 ` Maneesh Soni
2005-11-23 12:50 ` Maneesh Soni
2005-11-23 12:52 ` [OOPS] sysfs_hash_and_remove (was Re: What protection ....) Maneesh Soni
2005-11-24 12:26 ` Maneesh Soni
2005-11-24 14:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-26 22:26 ` James Bottomley
2006-02-11 0:33 ` Greg KH
2006-02-11 15:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-02-24 1:04 ` Greg KH
2005-11-23 12:56 ` What protection does sysfs_readdir have with SMP/Preemption? Steven Rostedt
2005-11-23 13:58 ` Maneesh Soni
2005-11-23 14:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-11-23 14:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-11-23 15:24 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2005-11-24 4:16 ` Maneesh Soni
2005-11-24 14:32 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1132759472.13395.65.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxraid@amcc.com \
--cc=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
--cc=matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=varenet@parisc-linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome