From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:06:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1135066007.2952.4.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43A7BAB5.7020201@yahoo.com.au>
> > Then code can switch to "struct mutex" if people want to. And if one
> > reason for it ends up being that the code avoids a performance bug in the
> > process, all the better ;)
> >
>
> Is this a good idea? Then we will have for a long time different
> bits of code with exactly the same synchronisation requirements
> using two different constructs that are slightly different. Not to
> mention code specifically requiring semaphores would get confusing.
>
> If we agree mutex is a good idea at all (and I think it is), then
> wouldn't it be better to aim for a wholesale conversion rather than
> "if people want to"?
well most of this will "only" take a few kernel releases ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-20 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-19 1:34 Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 4:22 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-19 4:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19 4:31 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-19 6:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-19 12:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19 16:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 15:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-19 19:25 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2005-12-19 19:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-21 16:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-01-10 10:28 ` Balbir Singh
2006-01-10 18:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-01-11 6:33 ` Balbir Singh
2006-01-11 9:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-12-19 20:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 20:19 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2005-12-19 20:32 ` Russell King
2005-12-19 20:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 19:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 20:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-19 23:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-20 8:03 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-20 8:06 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2005-12-20 8:21 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-20 8:36 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-20 8:48 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-19 16:22 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1135066007.2952.4.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjanv@infradead.org \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®