From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: vatsa@in.ibm.com, torvalds@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bryce@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check for online cpus before bringing them up
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:16:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1142558214.26706.31.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060316170814.02fa55a1.akpm@osdl.org>
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 17:08 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Bryce reported a bug wherein offlining CPU0 (on x86 box) and then subsequently
> > onlining it resulted in a lockup.
> >
> > On x86, CPU0 is never offlined. The subsequent attempt to online CPU0
> > doesn't take that into account. It actually tries to bootup the already
> > booted CPU. Following patch fixes the problem (as acknowledged by
> > Bryce). Please consider for inclusion in 2.6.16.
> >
> >
>
> Is x86 the only architecture which is exposed to this?
I guess i386 is the only architecture exposing to this. i386 uses a
slight different method to do cpu hotadd (prepare cpu, and then up cpu).
This is to workaround some issues like tsc synchronizing.
Thanks,
Shaohua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-17 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-16 17:44 Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-03-17 1:08 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-17 1:16 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2006-03-17 8:46 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-03-17 9:04 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-17 14:13 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-03-18 14:09 ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-21 1:08 ` Shaohua Li
2006-03-21 1:25 ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-21 1:36 ` Shaohua Li
2006-10-06 23:10 ` Status on CPU hotplug issues Bryce Harrington
2006-10-06 23:29 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-07 0:00 ` Bryce Harrington
2006-10-07 10:35 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-07 20:42 ` Bryce Harrington
2006-10-08 18:29 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-10-08 19:14 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-11 1:08 ` [BUG] 2.6.19-rc1-mm1: fs/file.c138 on ia64 Bryce Harrington
2006-10-11 1:15 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-11 5:38 ` Bryce Harrington
2006-10-07 10:24 ` Status on CPU hotplug issues Pavel Machek
2006-10-07 20:25 ` Bryce Harrington
2006-10-08 19:13 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-09 7:42 ` Bryce Harrington
2006-10-07 21:57 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-09 21:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-10-23 22:26 ` Bryce Harrington
2006-11-08 5:35 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-11-08 5:52 ` Bryce Harrington
2006-03-17 12:21 ` [PATCH] Check for online cpus before bringing them up Ashok Raj
2006-03-17 13:59 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1142558214.26706.31.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com \
--to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bryce@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®