mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: chrisw@sous-sol.org, matthew@wil.cx,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DoS with POSIX file locks?
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 06:12:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1143025967.12871.9.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1FLwjC-0000kJ-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>

On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 07:21 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > i concur with Trond, there's no sane way to get rid of it w/out
> > formalizing CLONE_FILES and locks on exec
> 
> Probably there is.  It would involve allocating a separate
> lock-owner-ID stored in files_struct but separate from it.  But it's
> more complicated than simply not propagating locks on exec in the
> CLONE_FILES case.

That doesn't solve the fundamental problem.

You would still have to be able to tell a remote server that some locks
which previously belonged to one owner are being reallocated to several
owners. That is not something that NFS, CIFS, AFS,... support, and I'd
be surprised if any of the clustered filesystems support it either.

Cheers,
  Trond


  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-22 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-20 11:41 Miklos Szeredi
2006-03-20 12:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-20 12:19   ` Miklos Szeredi
2006-03-20 12:39     ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-20 12:52       ` Miklos Szeredi
2006-03-20 13:13         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-20 13:24           ` Miklos Szeredi
2006-03-20 13:30             ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-20 13:39               ` Miklos Szeredi
2006-03-20 15:32         ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-20 16:41           ` Miklos Szeredi
2006-03-20 20:35             ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-03-21  6:38               ` Miklos Szeredi
2006-03-20 18:22           ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-21  9:44             ` Miklos Szeredi
2006-03-21 17:28               ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-21 17:58                 ` Miklos Szeredi
2006-03-21 18:16                   ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-21 19:16                   ` Chris Wright
2006-03-22  6:21                     ` Miklos Szeredi
2006-03-22 11:12                       ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2006-03-22 12:16                         ` Miklos Szeredi
2006-03-22 15:56                           ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-22 16:34                             ` Miklos Szeredi
2006-03-22 20:07                               ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-22 20:19                                 ` Miklos Szeredi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1143025967.12871.9.camel@lade.trondhjem.org \
    --to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®