From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [CPUFREQ] Fix implicit declarations in ondemand.
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 11:24:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1152095066.32572.49.camel@pmac.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060705025744.ea6ee5ed.akpm@osdl.org>
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 02:57 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 05:46:57 -0400
> Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:43:05AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 02:36 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 05:22:54 -0400 Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function ‘dbs_check_cpu’:
> > > > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:238: error: implicit declaration
> > > > of function ‘jiffies64_to_cputime64’
> > > > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:239: error: implicit declaration
> > > > of function ‘cputime64_sub’
> > >
> > > > > +#include <asm/cputime.h>
> > >
> > > > But kernel_stat.h already includes cputime.h, as does sched.h, and
> > > > pretty much everything pulls in sched.h.
> > > >
> > > > It's not bad to avoid a dependency upon nested includes, but I do
> > > > wonder how this error came about??
> > >
> > > asm-powerpc/cputime.h doesn't declare jiffies64_to_cputime64() or
> > > cputime64_sub()
> >
> > The curious part is why it isn't picking up the definition from asm-generic
> > like x86-64 & friends do.
> >
>
> CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
--- linux-2.6.17.ppc64/include/asm-powerpc/cputime.h~ 2006-06-18 02:49:35.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.17.ppc64/include/asm-powerpc/cputime.h 2006-07-05 11:19:35.000000000 +0100
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ typedef u64 cputime64_t;
#define cputime64_zero ((cputime64_t)0)
#define cputime64_add(__a, __b) ((__a) + (__b))
+#define cputime64_sub(__a, __b) ((__a) - (__b))
#define cputime_to_cputime64(__ct) (__ct)
#ifdef __KERNEL__
@@ -74,6 +75,23 @@ static inline cputime_t jiffies_to_cputi
return ct;
}
+static inline cputime64_t jiffies64_to_cputime64(const u64 jif)
+{
+ cputime_t ct;
+ u64 sec;
+
+ /* have to be a little careful about overflow */
+ ct = jif % HZ;
+ sec = jif / HZ;
+ if (ct) {
+ ct *= tb_ticks_per_sec;
+ do_div(ct, HZ);
+ }
+ if (sec)
+ ct += (cputime_t) sec * tb_ticks_per_sec;
+ return ct;
+}
+
static inline u64 cputime64_to_jiffies64(const cputime_t ct)
{
return mulhdu(ct, __cputime_jiffies_factor);
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-05 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-05 9:22 Dave Jones
2006-07-05 9:36 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-05 9:42 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-05 9:43 ` David Woodhouse
2006-07-05 9:46 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-05 9:57 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-05 10:24 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2006-07-05 23:09 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1152095066.32572.49.camel@pmac.infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®