From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] proc: Merge proc_tid_attr and proc_tgid_attr
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:05:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11556651333155-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1u04d98wa.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
The implementation is exactly the same and there is currently nothing to
distinguish proc_tid_attr, and proc_tgid_attr. So it is pointless
to have two separate implementations.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 54 +++++++++++-------------------------------------------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index f657210..9943527 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -1548,16 +1548,7 @@ static struct file_operations proc_pid_a
.write = proc_pid_attr_write,
};
-static struct pid_entry tgid_attr_stuff[] = {
- REG("current", S_IRUGO|S_IWUGO, pid_attr),
- REG("prev", S_IRUGO, pid_attr),
- REG("exec", S_IRUGO|S_IWUGO, pid_attr),
- REG("fscreate", S_IRUGO|S_IWUGO, pid_attr),
- REG("keycreate", S_IRUGO|S_IWUGO, pid_attr),
- REG("sockcreate", S_IRUGO|S_IWUGO, pid_attr),
- {}
-};
-static struct pid_entry tid_attr_stuff[] = {
+static struct pid_entry attr_dir_stuff[] = {
REG("current", S_IRUGO|S_IWUGO, pid_attr),
REG("prev", S_IRUGO, pid_attr),
REG("exec", S_IRUGO|S_IWUGO, pid_attr),
@@ -1567,53 +1558,30 @@ static struct pid_entry tid_attr_stuff[]
{}
};
-static int proc_tgid_attr_readdir(struct file * filp,
+static int proc_attr_dir_readdir(struct file * filp,
void * dirent, filldir_t filldir)
{
return proc_pident_readdir(filp,dirent,filldir,
- tgid_attr_stuff,ARRAY_SIZE(tgid_attr_stuff));
+ attr_dir_stuff,ARRAY_SIZE(attr_dir_stuff));
}
-static int proc_tid_attr_readdir(struct file * filp,
- void * dirent, filldir_t filldir)
-{
- return proc_pident_readdir(filp,dirent,filldir,
- tid_attr_stuff,ARRAY_SIZE(tid_attr_stuff));
-}
-
-static struct file_operations proc_tgid_attr_operations = {
- .read = generic_read_dir,
- .readdir = proc_tgid_attr_readdir,
-};
-
-static struct file_operations proc_tid_attr_operations = {
+static struct file_operations proc_attr_dir_operations = {
.read = generic_read_dir,
- .readdir = proc_tid_attr_readdir,
+ .readdir = proc_attr_dir_readdir,
};
-static struct dentry *proc_tgid_attr_lookup(struct inode *dir,
+static struct dentry *proc_attr_dir_lookup(struct inode *dir,
struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
{
- return proc_pident_lookup(dir, dentry, tgid_attr_stuff);
+ return proc_pident_lookup(dir, dentry, attr_dir_stuff);
}
-static struct dentry *proc_tid_attr_lookup(struct inode *dir,
- struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
-{
- return proc_pident_lookup(dir, dentry, tid_attr_stuff);
-}
-
-static struct inode_operations proc_tgid_attr_inode_operations = {
- .lookup = proc_tgid_attr_lookup,
+static struct inode_operations proc_attr_dir_inode_operations = {
+ .lookup = proc_attr_dir_lookup,
.getattr = pid_getattr,
.setattr = proc_setattr,
};
-static struct inode_operations proc_tid_attr_inode_operations = {
- .lookup = proc_tid_attr_lookup,
- .getattr = pid_getattr,
- .setattr = proc_setattr,
-};
#endif
/*
@@ -1671,7 +1639,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
REG("smaps", S_IRUGO, smaps),
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
- DIR("attr", S_IRUGO|S_IXUGO, tgid_attr),
+ DIR("attr", S_IRUGO|S_IXUGO, attr_dir),
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_KALLSYMS
INF("wchan", S_IRUGO, pid_wchan),
@@ -1988,7 +1956,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
REG("smaps", S_IRUGO, smaps),
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
- DIR("attr", S_IRUGO|S_IXUGO, tid_attr),
+ DIR("attr", S_IRUGO|S_IXUGO, attr_dir),
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_KALLSYMS
INF("wchan", S_IRUGO, pid_wchan),
--
1.4.2.rc3.g7e18e-dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-15 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-15 18:00 The rest of my proc cleanup Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-15 18:05 ` [PATCH 1/7] proc: Reorder the functions in base.c Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-15 18:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] proc: Modify proc_pident_lookup to be completely table driven Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-15 18:31 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-15 18:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-16 14:48 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-15 18:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] proc: Give the root directory a task Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-15 18:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] proc: Make the generation of the self symlink table driven Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-19 8:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-19 9:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-19 16:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-19 19:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-19 9:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-15 18:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] proc: Factor out an instantiate method from every lookup method Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-16 14:52 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-15 18:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] proc: Remove the hard coded inode numbers Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-15 18:05 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2006-08-15 18:33 ` The rest of my proc cleanup Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11556651333155-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome