mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <containers@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] proc: Make the generation of the self symlink table driven.
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:03:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060819090322.1b991a33.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1psexum92.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>

On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 03:07:37 -0600
ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:

> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:05:27 -0600
> > "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> >
> >> By not rolling our own inode we get a little more code reuse,
> >> and things get a little simpler and we don't have special
> >> cases to contend with later.
> >
> > On a standard FC5 install (which has selinux enabled) things get very ugly.
> >
> > udev: MAKEDEV: mkdir: file exists
> >
> > followed by a stream of udev errors of various sorts and then an infinite
> > loop of auditd complaints about klogd and "/" and tmpfs.  Nothing makes it
> > to logs because klogd itself is failing.
> 
> I'm not feeling very generous today.  I'm wondering what selinux bug
> I have found now.  Without selinux everything is fine on FC5.
> 
> Any chance of a search through that patchset to see which patch selinux
> trips on?
> 

This one.  "PATCH 4/7] proc: Make the generation of the self symlink table driven."

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-19 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-15 18:00 The rest of my proc cleanup Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-15 18:05 ` [PATCH 1/7] proc: Reorder the functions in base.c Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-15 18:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] proc: Modify proc_pident_lookup to be completely table driven Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-15 18:31   ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-15 18:55     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-16 14:48   ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-15 18:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] proc: Give the root directory a task Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-15 18:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] proc: Make the generation of the self symlink table driven Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-19  8:06   ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-19  9:07     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-19 16:03       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-08-19 19:04         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-19  9:54     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-15 18:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] proc: Factor out an instantiate method from every lookup method Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-16 14:52   ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-15 18:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] proc: Remove the hard coded inode numbers Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-15 18:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] proc: Merge proc_tid_attr and proc_tgid_attr Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-15 18:33 ` The rest of my proc cleanup Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060819090322.1b991a33.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®