* [PATCH] bdev: fix ->bd_part_count leak
@ 2006-11-02 10:48 Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-03 4:35 ` Neil Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2006-11-02 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, Andrew Morton; +Cc: Neil Brown
Don't leak a ->bd_part_count when the partition open fails with -ENXIO.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
fs/block_dev.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6-mm/fs/block_dev.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-mm.orig/fs/block_dev.c
+++ linux-2.6-mm/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -907,6 +907,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bd_set_size);
static int __blkdev_get(struct block_device *bdev, mode_t mode, unsigned flags,
int for_part);
+static int __blkdev_put(struct block_device *bdev, int for_part);
static int do_open(struct block_device *bdev, struct file *file, int for_part)
{
@@ -992,7 +993,7 @@ out_first:
bdev->bd_disk = NULL;
bdev->bd_inode->i_data.backing_dev_info = &default_backing_dev_info;
if (bdev != bdev->bd_contains)
- blkdev_put(bdev->bd_contains);
+ __blkdev_put(bdev->bd_contains, 1);
bdev->bd_contains = NULL;
put_disk(disk);
module_put(owner);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bdev: fix ->bd_part_count leak
2006-11-02 10:48 [PATCH] bdev: fix ->bd_part_count leak Peter Zijlstra
@ 2006-11-03 4:35 ` Neil Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2006-11-03 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andrew Morton
On Thursday November 2, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl wrote:
>
> Don't leak a ->bd_part_count when the partition open fails with -ENXIO.
>
Acked-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Thanks. It took me a while to see why that was a correct fix. I
wasn't noticing the 'if (bdev != bdev->bd_contains)' which is only
true after __blkdev_get(whole, ...., 1) has been called.
NeilBrown
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
> fs/block_dev.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-mm/fs/block_dev.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-mm.orig/fs/block_dev.c
> +++ linux-2.6-mm/fs/block_dev.c
> @@ -907,6 +907,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bd_set_size);
>
> static int __blkdev_get(struct block_device *bdev, mode_t mode, unsigned flags,
> int for_part);
> +static int __blkdev_put(struct block_device *bdev, int for_part);
>
> static int do_open(struct block_device *bdev, struct file *file, int for_part)
> {
> @@ -992,7 +993,7 @@ out_first:
> bdev->bd_disk = NULL;
> bdev->bd_inode->i_data.backing_dev_info = &default_backing_dev_info;
> if (bdev != bdev->bd_contains)
> - blkdev_put(bdev->bd_contains);
> + __blkdev_put(bdev->bd_contains, 1);
> bdev->bd_contains = NULL;
> put_disk(disk);
> module_put(owner);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-11-03 4:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-11-02 10:48 [PATCH] bdev: fix ->bd_part_count leak Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-03 4:35 ` Neil Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome