From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sds@tycho.nsa.gov, James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>,
chrisw@sous-sol.org
Subject: [RFC] make reading /proc/sys/kernel/cap-bould not require CAP_SYS_MODULE
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:39:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1166215188.20187.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
Reading /proc/sys/kernel/cap-bound requires CAP_SYS_MODULE. (see
proc_dointvec_bset in kernel/sysctl.c)
sysctl appears to drive all over proc reading everything it can get it's
hands on and is complaining when it is being denied access to read
cap-bound. Clearly writing to cap-bound should be a sensitive operation
but requiring CAP_SYS_MODULE to read cap-bound seems a bit to strong. I
believe the information could with reasonable certainty be obtained by
looking at a bunch of the output of /proc/pid/status which has very low
security protection, so at best we are just getting a little obfuscation
of information.
Currently SELinux policy has to 'dontaudit' capability checks for
CAP_SYS_MODULE for things like sysctl which just want to read cap-bound.
In doing so we also as a by product have to hide warnings of potential
exploits such as if at some time that sysctl actually tried to load a
module. I wondered if anyone would have a problem opening cap-bound up
to read from anyone? Possibly with something like the patch below?
-Eric
kernel/sysctl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2.6-upstream/kernel/sysctl.c.cap.sys.module
+++ linux-2.6-upstream/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -2020,7 +2020,7 @@ int proc_dointvec_bset(ctl_table *table,
{
int op;
- if (!capable(CAP_SYS_MODULE)) {
+ if (write && !capable(CAP_SYS_MODULE)) {
return -EPERM;
}
reply other threads:[~2006-12-15 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1166215188.20187.22.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®