mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC] make reading /proc/sys/kernel/cap-bould not require CAP_SYS_MODULE
@ 2006-12-15 20:39 Eric Paris
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Eric Paris @ 2006-12-15 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: sds, James Morris, chrisw

Reading /proc/sys/kernel/cap-bound requires CAP_SYS_MODULE.  (see
proc_dointvec_bset in kernel/sysctl.c)

sysctl appears to drive all over proc reading everything it can get it's
hands on and is complaining when it is being denied access to read
cap-bound.  Clearly writing to cap-bound should be a sensitive operation
but requiring CAP_SYS_MODULE to read cap-bound seems a bit to strong.  I
believe the information could with reasonable certainty be obtained by
looking at a bunch of the output of /proc/pid/status which has very low
security protection, so at best we are just getting a little obfuscation
of information.

Currently SELinux policy has to 'dontaudit' capability checks for
CAP_SYS_MODULE for things like sysctl which just want to read cap-bound.
In doing so we also as a by product have to hide warnings of potential
exploits such as if at some time that sysctl actually tried to load a
module.  I wondered if anyone would have a problem opening cap-bound up
to read from anyone?  Possibly with something like the patch below?

-Eric

 kernel/sysctl.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-2.6-upstream/kernel/sysctl.c.cap.sys.module
+++ linux-2.6-upstream/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -2020,7 +2020,7 @@ int proc_dointvec_bset(ctl_table *table,
 {
 	int op;
 
-	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_MODULE)) {
+	if (write && !capable(CAP_SYS_MODULE)) {
 		return -EPERM;
 	}
 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-12-15 20:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-12-15 20:39 [RFC] make reading /proc/sys/kernel/cap-bould not require CAP_SYS_MODULE Eric Paris

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®