* Dual licensing
@ 2007-06-19 16:41 Liberty
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Liberty @ 2007-06-19 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 314 bytes --]
I don't get it. It's really necessary to continue this rant on what
license the kernel should use ? I thought Linus was pretty clear on his
choice. It's becoming ridiculous and boring. STOP THE FLAME ALREADY
--
HOO-YA / SEMPER FIDELIS
01COMPUTERS di OVIDIO PIRVU
30174, CHIRIGNAGO-VE
VIA MIRANESE 331
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 481 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-06-19 16:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-06-19 16:41 Dual licensing Liberty
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®