[PATCH] [123/2many] MAINTAINERS - COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM (CIFS)

[PATCH] [123/2many] MAINTAINERS - COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM (CIFS)

[joe]

Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 1c014f1..5144e4e 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ L:	samba-technical@lists.samba.org
 W:	http://us1.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html
 T:	git kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfrench/cifs-2.6.git
 S:	Supported
+F:	fs/cifs/
 
 CONFIGFS
 P:	Joel Becker

Re: [PATCH] [123/2many] MAINTAINERS - COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM (CIFS)

[Andrew Bartlett]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1006 bytes --]

On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:25 -0700, joe@perches.com wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1c014f1..5144e4e 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ L:	samba-technical@lists.samba.org
>  W:	http://us1.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html
>  T:	git kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfrench/cifs-2.6.git
>  S:	Supported
> +F:	fs/cifs/

No comment on the F:, but the L: entry here is interesting.  Is
samba-technical really the right list for cifs-vfs patches?  Aside from
being CC'ed on such patches, I've never seen discussion of them on the
Samba mailing lists. 

Steve: Shouldn't that be linux-cifs-client?

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.                  http://redhat.com

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] [123/2many] MAINTAINERS - COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM (CIFS)

[Steve French]

Yes - I will fix this up.

On 8/13/07, joe@perches.com <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1c014f1..5144e4e 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ L:        samba-technical@lists.samba.org
>  W:     http://us1.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html
>  T:     git kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfrench/cifs-2.6.git
>  S:     Supported
> +F:     fs/cifs/
>
>  CONFIGFS
>  P:     Joel Becker
>


-- 
Thanks,

Steve

Re: [PATCH] [123/2many] MAINTAINERS - COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM (CIFS)

[Steve French]

On 8/13/07, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:25 -0700, joe@perches.com wrote:
> > Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 1c014f1..5144e4e 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ L:      samba-technical@lists.samba.org
> >  W:   http://us1.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html
> >  T:   git kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfrench/cifs-2.6.git
> >  S:   Supported
> > +F:   fs/cifs/
>
> No comment on the F:, but the L: entry here is interesting.  Is
> samba-technical really the right list for cifs-vfs patches?  Aside from
> being CC'ed on such patches, I've never seen discussion of them on the
> Samba mailing lists.
>
> Steve: Shouldn't that be linux-cifs-client?

linux-cifs-client is mentioned on the L: entry immediately before the
samba-technical one so no change seems to be needed for that.

I updated the W: line to point to the preferred URL
(http://linux-cifs.samba.org)

Adding an F: entry in the future is fine by me

-- 
Thanks,

Steve