* [PATCH] free_irq(): Actually handle DEBUG_SHIRQ
@ 2007-09-12 11:17 Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-09-12 11:29 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2007-09-12 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, David Woodhouse; +Cc: linux-kernel
Code used for DEBUG_SHIRQ in free_irq() is unreachable -- the for() loop
within never terminates otherwise than by return. This is an obvious fix.
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
---
Please apply.
While at it, I have a question about the complementary code within
request_irq(): when the option in question is enabled, a spurious IRQ is
posted before internal setup is done by setup_irq(). This includes the
->depth counter. Now if the interrupt handler of some driver calls
disable_irq_nosync(), then code in setup_irq() will mess up the state of
->depth afterwards if this is the first handler being installed (i.e.
within the "if (!shared)" block). This is reported later on when
enable_irq() called by the driver, by means of a message like this:
Unbalanced enable for IRQ 34
WARNING: at kernel/irq/manage.c:158 enable_irq()
Now given DEBUG_SHIRQ is a debug facility, not to be normally used for
production, is the phenomenon as described considered a design limitation
we can live with, or is it a bug that qualifies for a fix?
I can reproduce this problem easily with phylib.
Maciej
patch-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904-debug-shirq-0
diff -up --recursive --new-file linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904.macro/kernel/irq/manage.c linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904/kernel/irq/manage.c
--- linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904.macro/kernel/irq/manage.c 2007-09-04 04:56:21.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904/kernel/irq/manage.c 2007-09-11 23:58:59.000000000 +0000
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ void free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *de
if (action->flags & IRQF_SHARED)
handler = action->handler;
kfree(action);
- return;
+ break;
}
printk(KERN_ERR "Trying to free already-free IRQ %d\n", irq);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] free_irq(): Actually handle DEBUG_SHIRQ
2007-09-12 11:17 [PATCH] free_irq(): Actually handle DEBUG_SHIRQ Maciej W. Rozycki
@ 2007-09-12 11:29 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2007-09-12 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maciej W. Rozycki; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 12:17 +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Code used for DEBUG_SHIRQ in free_irq() is unreachable -- the for()
> loop within never terminates otherwise than by return. This is an
> obvious fix.
Yeah... except that it enables new debugging code which (due to my
stupidity) wasn't enabled before. A fix for this is already in the -mm
tree, to be merged (along with a corresponding lockdep-related fix)
after 2.6.23 release.
--
dwmw2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-12 11:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-12 11:17 [PATCH] free_irq(): Actually handle DEBUG_SHIRQ Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-09-12 11:29 ` David Woodhouse
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®