From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 9/12] ACPI / scan: Remove unnecessary initialization of local variables
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 01:07:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11913672.0klWX8xjg6@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418767.4KIZOTK1lk@vostro.rjw.lan>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The local variables in acpi_bus_get_power_flags() need not be
initialized upfront, so change the code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1091,9 +1091,9 @@ static void acpi_bus_init_power_state(st
static void acpi_bus_get_power_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
{
- acpi_status status = 0;
- acpi_handle handle = NULL;
- u32 i = 0;
+ acpi_status status;
+ acpi_handle handle;
+ u32 i;
/* Presence of _PS0|_PR0 indicates 'power manageable' */
status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_PS0", &handle);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-04 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-03 23:16 [PATCH 0/12] ACPI: Rework the handling of power resources Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-04 0:01 ` [PATCH 1/12] ACPI / PM: Rework the handling of devices depending on " Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-04 0:02 ` [PATCH 2/12] ACPI / scan: More straightforward preparation of ACPI device objects Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-04 0:03 ` [PATCH 3/12] ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-04 0:03 ` [PATCH 4/12] ACPI: Drop power resources driver Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-04 0:04 ` [PATCH 5/12] ACPI: Do not use device power states of power resources Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-04 0:05 ` [PATCH 6/12] ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-04 0:06 ` [PATCH 7/12] ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of wakeup " Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-04 0:07 ` [PATCH 8/12] ACPI / scan: Move power state initialization to a separate routine Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-04 0:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-01-04 0:08 ` [PATCH 10/12] ACPI / scan: Consolidate extraction of power resources lists Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-04 0:09 ` [PATCH 11/12] ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-04 0:10 ` [PATCH 12/12] ACPI: Use system level attribute of wakeup power resources Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-11 21:57 ` [PATCH 0/12] ACPI: Rework the handling of " Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11913672.0klWX8xjg6@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®