From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Gianluca Alberici <gianluca@abinetworks.biz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS Bug in 2.6.23 ? SOLUTION ?
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:42:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1195414941.10559.10.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <474087F6.9030305@abinetworks.biz>
On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 19:44 +0100, Gianluca Alberici wrote:
> Trond,
>
> The problem is in nfs_mountpoint_timeout. After this time
> dentry_delete(/,4) removes the mountpoint, then it is very difficult to
> automount (at least with CFSD), one has got to try 2 or three times
> cd'ing into the mount point. Applications wont ever had the chance to
> autoremount (ENOTDIR).
Sounds like CFSD has a bug w.r.t. what fsid it returns to the client.
> I have some questions:
>
> - nfs_mountpoint_timeout seems to be set in sysctl.c even if nfsv4 is
> not. Is this correct ? I've read somewhere that it was introduced for v4.
Wrong. It applies to all mountpoint crossing. If the server tells us
that the fsid has changed, then we create a new mountpoint.
> - Why this sysctl is not registered in my 2.6.20 kernel where it should
> be registered ?
Prior to 2.6.21-rc5, we had a bug in register_nfs_fs() whereby it failed
to register the sysctl table unless you enabled NFSv4.
> - Why this parameter has not a 'disabled' value (i mean kind of -1) ?
Why should it? The current behaviour is quite correct. If you cross a
mountpoint, then you should remount in order to ensure that the inode
numbers remain unique per-filesystem.
We know that some ancient NFS servers had problems returning the correct
fsid in readdirplus replies, so 2.6.22 adds support to disable
readdirplus calls via a 'nordirplus' mount option. I guess you could try
that...
Trond
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-18 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-16 10:05 NFS Bug in 2.6.23 ? Gianluca Alberici
2007-11-16 12:11 ` markus reichelt
2007-11-16 14:21 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-11-17 13:38 ` Gianluca Alberici
2007-11-17 17:27 ` Gianluca Alberici
2007-11-18 18:44 ` NFS Bug in 2.6.23 ? SOLUTION ? Gianluca Alberici
2007-11-18 19:42 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2007-11-19 7:41 ` Gianluca Alberici
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1195414941.10559.10.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=gianluca@abinetworks.biz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®