mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gianluca Alberici <gianluca@abinetworks.biz>
To: Gianluca Alberici <gianluca@abinetworks.biz>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
	markus reichelt <ml@mareichelt.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS Bug in 2.6.23 ?
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:27:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <473F2464.3020905@abinetworks.biz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <473EEEC7.1070300@abinetworks.biz>

Hello,

I have found out something new about the cfs problem:

1) on a 2.6.20, working good:

after starting cfs, nothing cattach'd:

zeus:~# cat /proc/fs/nfsfs/volumes
NV SERVER   PORT DEV     FSID
v2 7f000001  be9 0:14    0:0

after cattaching (and at least once listing the directory, if not 
everything remains as above):

zeus:~# cat /proc/fs/nfsfs/volumes
NV SERVER   PORT DEV     FSID
v2 7f000001  be9 0:14    0:0
v2 7f000001  be9 0:15    1:0

from now everything is OK forever....

2) On 2.6.23  at cfsd restart

mars:~# cat /proc/fs/nfsfs/volumes
NV SERVER   PORT DEV     FSID
v2 7f000001  be9 0:14    0:0

after cattaching i get

mars:~# cat /proc/fs/nfsfs/volumes
NV SERVER   PORT DEV     FSID
v2 7f000001  be9 0:14    1:0
v2 7f000001  be9 0:15    1:0

The first FSID has chnaged and is 1:0 as the second while on 2.6.20 this 
doesnt happens.
I know nothing about NFS internals but isnt strange to have the same 
FSID on 2 volumes ?

BTW, the 2 machines have the same disk image. No diffs but the kernel.

Maybe this means nothing, if so sorry for the noise.

Gianluca





  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-17 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-16 10:05 Gianluca Alberici
2007-11-16 12:11 ` markus reichelt
2007-11-16 14:21   ` Trond Myklebust
2007-11-17 13:38     ` Gianluca Alberici
2007-11-17 17:27       ` Gianluca Alberici [this message]
2007-11-18 18:44         ` NFS Bug in 2.6.23 ? SOLUTION ? Gianluca Alberici
2007-11-18 19:42           ` Trond Myklebust
2007-11-19  7:41             ` Gianluca Alberici
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-16  9:46 NFS Bug in 2.6.23 ? Gianluca Alberici
2007-11-16  9:27 Gianluca Alberici
2007-11-16 14:16 ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=473F2464.3020905@abinetworks.biz \
    --to=gianluca@abinetworks.biz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ml@mareichelt.de \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®