From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>, Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq: Fix doorbell.access_width
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 23:13:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <119a72eb-b691-77cf-9d3a-55b67a50f410@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466664342.5839.39.camel@gmail.com>
On 6/23/2016 8:45 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Commit 920de6ebfab8 apparently exposed a latent bug, doorbell.access_width
> is initialized to 64, but per Lv Zheng, it should be 4, and indeed, making
> that change does bring pcc-cpufreq back to life.
>
> Suggested-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
> @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static int __init pcc_cpufreq_probe(void
> doorbell.space_id = reg_resource->space_id;
> doorbell.bit_width = reg_resource->bit_width;
> doorbell.bit_offset = reg_resource->bit_offset;
> - doorbell.access_width = 64;
> + doorbell.access_width = 4;
> doorbell.address = reg_resource->address;
>
> pr_debug("probe: doorbell: space_id is %d, bit_width is %d, "
OK, I picked this up from the LKML patchwork (will push to Linus
tomorrow), but next time please CC patches related to ACPI to linux-acpi
and PM patches to linux-pm (so this one should have gone to both,
ideally). They are much easier to handle/review then and more people
are likely to look at them too.
Thanks,
Rafael
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-23 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-22 7:07 4.7 regression - ACPICA: Hardware: Enhance acpi_hw_validate_register() with access_width/bit_offset awareness Mike Galbraith
2016-06-23 0:32 ` Zheng, Lv
2016-06-23 4:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-06-23 6:45 ` [patch] cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq: Fix doorbell.access_width Mike Galbraith
2016-06-23 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=119a72eb-b691-77cf-9d3a-55b67a50f410@intel.com \
--to=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®