From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen: privcmd: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 13:30:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11cf87f7-060d-413a-a42e-bc39619cd11a@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251106155831.306248-3-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1671 bytes --]
On 06.11.25 16:58, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
> used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
> WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
> schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
> again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
> This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
>
> alloc_workqueue() treats all queues as per-CPU by default, while unbound
> workqueues must opt-in via WQ_UNBOUND.
>
> This default is suboptimal: most workloads benefit from unbound queues,
> allowing the scheduler to place worker threads where they’re needed and
> reducing noise when CPUs are isolated.
>
> This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with
> the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in:
>
> commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
> commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
>
> This change adds a new WQ_PERCPU flag to explicitly request alloc_workqueue()
> to be per-cpu when WQ_UNBOUND has not been specified.
>
> With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND),
> any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn’t explicitly specify WQ_UNBOUND
> must now use WQ_PERCPU.
>
> Once migration is complete, WQ_UNBOUND can be removed and unbound will
> become the implicit default.
>
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Juergen
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3743 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-05 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-06 15:58 [PATCH 0/2] replace system_wq with system_percpu_wq, add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue Marco Crivellari
2025-11-06 15:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] xen/events: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq Marco Crivellari
2026-01-05 12:30 ` Jürgen Groß
2025-11-06 15:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] xen: privcmd: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users Marco Crivellari
2026-01-05 12:30 ` Jürgen Groß [this message]
2025-12-24 15:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] replace system_wq with system_percpu_wq, add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue Marco Crivellari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11cf87f7-060d-413a-a42e-bc39619cd11a@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®