Re: [x86] list of style offenders

[Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>]

On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 23:47 +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2008 11:41 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 23:35 +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> > > On Jan 10, 2008 9:03 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I was playing with checkpatch.pl ;) .. I made a list of style offenders
> > > > inside the arch/x86/ sub-directory. I thought it might be helpful to
> > > > prioritize any style clean ups that people might want to do for x86 ..
> > > > OTOH some of these might show imperfections in checkpatch.pl .. Either
> > > > way I thought it was interesting to review ..
> > > >
> > > > These are sorted by errors, then warnings.. I only included the first
> > > > hundred files which includes about the top %30 of the list .. The
> > > > kprobes_64.c error rate is a little miss-leading because several errors
> > > > are found on a single line ..
> > >
> > > I just pulled
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86 mm
> > >
> > > > ./arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_trig.c
> > > >                 total: 649 errors, 11 warnings, 1845 lines checked
> >
> > Ok, looks like people have been busy .. I was using Linus's git, which
> > was handy at the time I ran the test ..
> 
> Do you have a script aroung checkpatch.pl for collecting the statistics
> you posted? If so, I can run it agains the x86 git tree and report the output.

I was just about to do that .. It was actually several one-liner type
scripts which I strung together .. I'll send and updated list in a bit..

Daniel