Re: [x86] list of style offenders

[Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>]

On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 23:35 +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2008 9:03 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I was playing with checkpatch.pl ;) .. I made a list of style offenders
> > inside the arch/x86/ sub-directory. I thought it might be helpful to
> > prioritize any style clean ups that people might want to do for x86 ..
> > OTOH some of these might show imperfections in checkpatch.pl .. Either
> > way I thought it was interesting to review ..
> >
> > These are sorted by errors, then warnings.. I only included the first
> > hundred files which includes about the top %30 of the list .. The
> > kprobes_64.c error rate is a little miss-leading because several errors
> > are found on a single line ..
> 
> I just pulled
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86 mm
> 
> > ./arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_trig.c
> >                 total: 649 errors, 11 warnings, 1845 lines checked
> 
> On that tree checkpatch reports:
> total: 5 errors, 54 warnings, 1643 lines checked
> 
> > ./arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c
> >                 total: 528 errors, 9 warnings, 749 lines checked
> 
> total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 lines checked

I pulled the tree your working with , and it's got mostly the same
issues .. Are you sure your running the commands properly?

The "lines checked" values that you listed looks wrong .. A few you
listed as "0 lines checked" , or "1 lines checked" .. Which can't be
right..

The git logs also show that arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_trig.c hasn't been
modified since it was pull in on Oct. 11 ..

Daniel