mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
To: "Joe Perches" <joe@perches.com>,
	"Matti Aarnio" <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>
Cc: "Harvey Harrison" <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>,
	"Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@mailshack.com>,
	"LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Alternative implementation of the generic __ffs
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:42:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1208680941.5276.1248837773@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1208660817.12388.40.camel@localhost>

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:06:57 -0700, "Joe Perches" <joe@perches.com>
said:
> On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 01:29 +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> > I am curious, why not take the code already in glibc ffs() for ARM ?
> > That is, if the ffs() is all that important detail in kernel ?

Hi,

The glibc version is based on a table-lookup. This makes it
behave differently in hot and cold cache situations. That's
fine if __ffs is used in tight loops, but in the kernel such
use of __ffs is avoided because it might be slow. I added it
to the benchmark, but it would need testing for the cold
cache case too.

As for the importance of __ffs in the kernel: as far as I
know the hot-spots in the kernel using __ffs are the
schedular (sched_find_first_bit) and the cpu mask walking
code (for_each_cpu_mask).

Greetings,
    Alexander

> Here's test results with the glibc ffs implementation.
> (small const is still using slower add rather than or)

Added, thanks.

> $ gcc -Os -fomit-frame-pointer ffs.c
> $ ./a.out
> Original:       3155 tics,  8331 tics
> New:            4211 tics,  8793 tics
> Smallest:       4019 tics,  7754 tics
> Small const:    3552 tics,  6308 tics
> glibc:          2816 tics,  6911 tics
> Empty loop:     1516 tics,  2244 tics
> 
> $ gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer ffs.c
> $ ./a.out
> Original:       3155 tics,  7828 tics
> New:            4792 tics,  8825 tics
> Smallest:       4401 tics,  7155 tics
> Small const:    3539 tics,  5805 tics
> glibc:          2720 tics,  7061 tics
> Empty loop:     1516 tics,  2148 tics
> 
> $ gcc -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer ffs.c
> $ ./a.out
> Original:       3080 tics,  7706 tics
> New:            4721 tics,  8663 tics
> Smallest:       4334 tics,  7116 tics
> Small const:    3466 tics,  5672 tics
> glibc:          2649 tics,  6939 tics
> Empty loop:     1444 tics,  2012 tics
> 
> 
-- 
  Alexander van Heukelum
  heukelum@fastmail.fm

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service


  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-20  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-31 17:15 [PATCH] x86: generic versions of find_first_(zero_)bit, convert i386 Alexander van Heukelum
2008-03-31 17:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-03-31 19:38   ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-03-31 21:58     ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-01  8:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-01  9:46   ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-01 15:41     ` [PATCH] x86: switch x86_64 to generic find_first_bit Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-01 15:42       ` [PATCH] x86: optimize find_first_bit for small bitmaps Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-01 15:47         ` [PATCH] x86: remove x86-specific implementations of find_first_bit Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-03  9:34           ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-04  8:47           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-06 17:03     ` [PATCH] x86: generic versions of find_first_(zero_)bit, convert i386 dean gaudet
2008-04-06 18:51       ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-06 20:22         ` dean gaudet
2008-04-07  8:43           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-07 10:25           ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-18 20:18             ` Alternative implementation of the generic __ffs Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-18 23:46               ` dean gaudet
2008-04-19  0:09                 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-04-19  0:20                   ` dean gaudet
2008-04-19  0:58                     ` Joe Perches
2008-04-19  1:04                       ` Harvey Harrison
2008-04-19  1:11                         ` dean gaudet
2008-04-19  2:55                           ` Joe Perches
2008-04-19  4:13                             ` dean gaudet
2008-04-19 10:05                               ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-04-19 12:10                               ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-19 18:17                                 ` Joe Perches
2008-04-19 20:26                                   ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-19 22:29                             ` Matti Aarnio
2008-04-20  3:06                               ` Joe Perches
2008-04-20  8:42                                 ` Alexander van Heukelum [this message]
2008-04-20 12:31                                   ` Matti Aarnio
2008-04-21 11:43                                     ` Alexander van Heukelum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1208680941.5276.1248837773@webmail.messagingengine.com \
    --to=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
    --cc=heukelum@mailshack.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome