From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Should I bother with another attempt at merging TuxOnIce?
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:35:24 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1209040524.1028.7.camel@nigel-laptop> (raw)
Hi all.
I guess the topic pretty much summarises my question.
TuxOnIce has a lot of worthwhile improvements over mainline (I won't
list them unless asked) and I'd still like to see it merged. I don't,
however, have the time or energy to put into trying to incrementally
modify swsusp to match.
Regards,
Nigel
reply other threads:[~2008-04-24 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1209040524.1028.7.camel@nigel-laptop \
--to=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®