Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN

[Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>]

On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 16:08 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 01:47:29PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >...
> > FYI your attitude in the past few weeks is getting on my nerves - you
> > act all self important but have not made a single contribution to the
> > kernel above the level of a janitor-newbie.
> 
> Not a single contribution to the kernel above the level of a 
> janitor-newbie?
> 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/676733
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/14/498
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/28/561
> ....
> 
> Awaiting your apology

Oooh, you caught a few bugs in review... *applause*. Of course I
understand you just forgot to append the url or git commit of the patch
series that added a significant feature to the core kernel, or solved a
significant issue.

I mean, counting all the way up to 3, that must have been taxing you.

So of course I appologise for my ignorance of your intellectual feats
and invaluable contributions to the linux kernel. </sarcasm>

Seriously, you're a good janitor, and I appreciate that. Stick to it, or
help write code.