From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.26-rc4] mount.nfsv4/memory poisoning issues...
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:33:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1213130012.20459.58.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080610161352.4e588653@tleilax.poochiereds.net>
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 16:13 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> We can't call nfs_callback_down() until after nfs_callback_up()
> returns, so we're guaranteed to have "task" set to a valid task
> (presuming that nfs_callback_up() doesn't return error). We also can't
> return from nfs_callback_down() until after the nfs_callback_svc() has
> exited. kthread_stop() will block until it does.
The code I'm alluding to is in kthread():
/* OK, tell user we're spawned, wait for stop or wakeup */
__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
complete(&create->started);
schedule();
if (!kthread_should_stop())
ret = threadfn(data);
schedule() is called _after_ the complete() call, and _before_ we
execute threadfn() a.k.a. nfs_callback_svc(). If nfs_alloc_client() has
time to call nfs_callback_down() before the above thread gets scheduled
back in, then threadfn() doesn't get called at all, since
kthread_should_stop() is true.
Cheers
Trond
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-10 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-04 23:33 Daniel J Blueman
2008-06-04 23:43 ` Chuck Lever
2008-06-15 18:10 ` Daniel J Blueman
2008-06-16 16:17 ` Chuck Lever
2008-06-19 12:14 ` Jeff Layton
2008-06-19 12:37 ` Daniel J Blueman
2008-06-19 17:32 ` Chuck Lever
2008-06-05 0:35 ` Jeff Layton
2008-06-05 8:28 ` Daniel J Blueman
2008-06-05 10:32 ` Jeff Layton
2008-06-10 18:54 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-06-10 19:13 ` Jeff Layton
2008-06-10 19:18 ` Jeff Layton
2008-06-10 20:27 ` Daniel J Blueman
2008-06-18 12:07 ` Jeff Layton
2008-06-21 17:52 ` Daniel J Blueman
2008-06-10 19:58 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-06-10 20:13 ` Jeff Layton
2008-06-10 20:33 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2008-06-10 20:41 ` Jeff Layton
2008-06-10 21:01 ` Jeff Layton
2008-06-10 21:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-06-10 22:04 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1213130012.20459.58.camel@localhost \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=daniel.blueman@gmail.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome