mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	davej@codemonkey.org.uk, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>, Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 07/13] sched: Reduce stack size requirements in kernel/sched.c
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:24:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1220783087.8687.73.camel@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080906235037.880702000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com>

On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 16:50 -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
> plain text document attachment (stack-hogs-kernel_sched_c)
> * Make the following changes to kernel/sched.c functions:
> 
>     - use node_to_cpumask_ptr in place of node_to_cpumask
>     - use get_cpumask_var for temporary cpumask_t variables
>     - use alloc_cpumask_ptr where available
> 
>   * Remove special code for SCHED_CPUMASK_ALLOC and use CPUMASK_ALLOC
>     from linux/cpumask.h.
> 
>   * The resultant stack savings are:
> 
>     ====== Stack (-l 100)
> 
> 	1 - initial
> 	2 - stack-hogs-kernel_sched_c
> 	'.' is less than the limit(100)
> 
>        .1.    .2.    ..final..
>       2216  -1536 680   -69%  __build_sched_domains
>       1592  -1592   .  -100%  move_task_off_dead_cpu
>       1096  -1096   .  -100%  sched_balance_self
>       1032  -1032   .  -100%  sched_setaffinity
>        616   -616   .  -100%  rebalance_domains
>        552   -552   .  -100%  free_sched_groups
>        512   -512   .  -100%  cpu_to_allnodes_group
>       7616  -6936 680   -91%  Totals
> 
> 
> Applies to linux-2.6.tip/master.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched.c |  151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux-2.6.tip.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6.tip/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@
>  #include <linux/bootmem.h>
>  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>  #include <linux/ctype.h>
> +#include <linux/cpumask_ptr.h>
>  #include <linux/ftrace.h>
>  #include <trace/sched.h>
>  
> @@ -117,6 +118,12 @@
>   */
>  #define RUNTIME_INF	((u64)~0ULL)
>  
> +/*
> + * temp cpumask variables
> + */
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPUMASK(temp_cpumask_1);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPUMASK(temp_cpumask_2);

Yuck, that relies on turning preemption off everywhere you want to use
those.


> @@ -5384,11 +5400,14 @@ out_unlock:
>  
>  long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const cpumask_t *in_mask)
>  {
> -	cpumask_t cpus_allowed;
> -	cpumask_t new_mask = *in_mask;
> +	cpumask_ptr cpus_allowed;
> +	cpumask_ptr new_mask;
>  	struct task_struct *p;
>  	int retval;
>  
> +	get_cpumask_var(cpus_allowed, temp_cpumask_1);
> +	get_cpumask_var(new_mask, temp_cpumask_2);
> +	*new_mask = *in_mask;
>  	get_online_cpus();
>  	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);

BUG!

get_online_cpus() can sleep, but you just disabled preemption with those
get_cpumask_var() horribles!

Couldn't be arsed to look through the rest, but I really hate this
cpumask_ptr() stuff that relies on disabling preemption.

NAK


  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-07 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-06 23:50 [RFC 00/13] smp: reduce stack requirements for genapic send_IPI_mask functions Mike Travis
2008-09-06 23:50 ` [RFC 01/13] smp: modify send_IPI_mask interface to accept cpumask_t pointers Mike Travis
2008-09-06 23:50 ` [RFC 02/13] cpumask: add for_each_online_cpu_mask_nr function Mike Travis
2008-09-06 23:50 ` [RFC 03/13] xen: use new " Mike Travis
2008-09-06 23:50 ` [RFC 04/13] cpumask: add cpumask_ptr operations Mike Travis
2008-09-06 23:50 ` [RFC 05/13] cpumask: add get_cpumask_var debug operations Mike Travis
2008-09-06 23:50 ` [RFC 06/13] genapic: use get_cpumask_var operations for allbutself cpumask_ts Mike Travis
2008-09-06 23:50 ` [RFC 07/13] sched: Reduce stack size requirements in kernel/sched.c Mike Travis
2008-09-07 10:24   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-09-07 11:00     ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-07 13:05       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-08 14:56         ` Mike Travis
2008-09-07 20:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-08 14:54     ` Mike Travis
2008-09-08 15:05       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-08 18:38         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-10 22:47           ` [RFC] CPUMASK: proposal for replacing cpumask_t Mike Travis
2008-09-10 22:53             ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-10 23:33               ` Mike Travis
2008-09-11  5:21                 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-11  9:00             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-11 15:04               ` Mike Travis
2008-09-12  4:55             ` Rusty Russell
2008-09-12 14:28               ` Mike Travis
2008-09-12 22:02                 ` Rusty Russell
2008-09-12 22:50                   ` Mike Travis
2008-09-12 22:58                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-06 23:50 ` [RFC 08/13] cpufreq: Reduce stack size requirements in acpi-cpufreq.c Mike Travis
2008-09-06 23:50 ` [RFC 09/13] genapic: reduce stack pressuge in io_apic.c step 1 temp cpumask_ts Mike Travis
2008-09-08 11:01   ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-08 16:03     ` Mike Travis
2008-09-06 23:50 ` [RFC 10/13] genapic: reduce stack pressuge in io_apic.c step 2 internal abi Mike Travis
2008-09-06 23:50 ` [RFC 11/13] genapic: reduce stack pressuge in io_apic.c step 3 target_cpus Mike Travis
2008-09-07  7:55   ` Bert Wesarg
2008-09-07  9:13     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-08 15:01       ` Mike Travis
2008-09-08 15:29     ` Mike Travis
2008-09-06 23:50 ` [RFC 12/13] genapic: reduce stack pressuge in io_apic.c step 4 vector allocation Mike Travis
2008-09-06 23:50 ` [RFC 13/13] genapic: reduce stack pressuge in io_apic.c step 5 cpu_mask_to_apicid Mike Travis
2008-09-07  7:36 ` [RFC 00/13] smp: reduce stack requirements for genapic send_IPI_mask functions Ingo Molnar
2008-09-08 15:17   ` Mike Travis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1220783087.8687.73.camel@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=jes@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®