From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@infradead.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
Sven Dietrich <sdietrich@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 0/5] genirq: add infrastructure for threaded interrupt handlers
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:04:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1222974254.2995.144.camel@laptop-eth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0810022004520.5549@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 20:42 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Clearly you have neither clue about real time nor about operating
> systems in general.
Here we go again Thomas.. You think you can have a conversation without
the insults for once?
> Solaris, some BSDs and MacOSX use interrupt threads. Where exactly is
> the relation to realtime?
The very fact that you mention it in your release notes .. You mention
the type of system in "preempt-rt" and the advantage of your system..
> The concept of interrupt threads is nothing which is in any way
> related to real time. It is a well known and pretty old concept in
> operating system design.
>
> The fact that real time operating systems benefit from interrupt
> threads is a totally different topic.
>
The fact that a direct relationship exists means that any threaded
interrupt system needs to take into account the inevitable connection to
real time since it will be used in that system as a core component.. If
you can't effectively achieve real time with your system , than that's a
problem that needs to be addressed.
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-02 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-01 23:02 Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-01 23:02 ` [RFC patch 1/5] genirq: make irqreturn_t an enum Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-01 23:02 ` [RFC patch 2/5] genirq: add a quick check handler Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-02 0:47 ` Jon Masters
2008-10-02 5:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-02 10:51 ` Jon Masters
2008-10-02 22:06 ` Greg KH
2008-10-02 4:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-03 8:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-03 10:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-01 23:02 ` [RFC patch 3/5] genirq: add threaded interrupt handler support Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-02 5:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-01 23:02 ` [RFC patch 4/5] genirq: add a helper to check whether the irq thread should run Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-01 23:02 ` [RFC patch 5/5] genirq: make irq threading robust Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-02 0:52 ` Jon Masters
2008-10-02 5:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-01 23:23 ` [RFC patch 0/5] genirq: add infrastructure for threaded interrupt handlers Andrew Morton
2008-10-01 23:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-01 23:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-01 23:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-02 0:40 ` Jon Masters
2008-10-02 22:07 ` Greg KH
2008-10-08 22:18 ` Ingo Oeser
2008-10-02 1:53 ` Daniel Walker
2008-10-02 15:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-02 15:48 ` Daniel Walker
2008-10-02 18:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-02 19:04 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2008-10-02 19:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-02 19:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-02 20:09 ` Daniel Walker
2008-10-02 20:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-02 20:48 ` Daniel Walker
2008-10-02 21:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-02 21:30 ` Daniel Walker
2008-10-02 22:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-02 23:24 ` Daniel Walker
2008-10-03 0:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-03 14:44 ` Daniel Walker
2008-10-02 14:46 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-02 21:31 ` Greg KH
2008-10-02 22:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-03 3:25 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-03 3:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-03 4:35 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-03 3:23 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-21 1:32 ` [RFC patch] genirq threading for ehci, ohci and uhci USB hosts Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2008-10-21 2:07 ` Jonathan Woithe
2008-10-21 10:29 ` [RFC patch] genirq threading (v2) for ehci, ohci and uhci USB hosts and ohci1394 Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1222974254.2995.144.camel@laptop-eth \
--to=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sdietrich@suse.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®