* [PATCH] regulator: Don't warn if we failed to get a regulator
@ 2009-03-11 23:35 Mark Brown
2009-03-12 10:54 ` Liam Girdwood
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2009-03-11 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liam Girdwood; +Cc: linux-kernel, Mark Brown
The consumer can print a message if required, some consumers may have
optional regulators and wish to downgrade the logging for them or ignore
their absence.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 08441e2..019a8a4 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1031,8 +1031,6 @@ struct regulator *regulator_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
goto found;
}
}
- printk(KERN_ERR "regulator: Unable to get requested regulator: %s\n",
- id);
mutex_unlock(®ulator_list_mutex);
return regulator;
--
1.5.6.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-12 10:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-11 23:35 [PATCH] regulator: Don't warn if we failed to get a regulator Mark Brown
2009-03-12 10:54 ` Liam Girdwood
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®