From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Alex.Zeffertt" <Alex.Zeffertt@citrix.com>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clockevent: on resume program the next oneshot tick with the next actual event
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:46:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1238003202.3691.174.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49CA678A.30606@goop.org>
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 10:19 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Ian Campbell wrote:
> > When resuming a Xen domU we were seeing an issue where the timer ticks never
> > seemed to start up again. This was with CONFIG_NO_HZ=y, the Xen clocksource
> > has CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT but not CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC.
> >
> > The issue is that on resume tick_resume_oneshot() tries to program an event for
> > "now", e.g.
> > tick_program_event(ktime_get(), 1);
> >
> > However further down the call chain tick_dev_program_event() then compares that
> >
> Where's that? Do you mean in clockevents_program_event():
>
> delta = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(expires, now));
>
> if (delta <= 0)
> return -ETIME;
>
>
> ?
Yes that's the one.
> > With this fix I can successfully resume a Xen domain.
> >
>
> That's good, but I think there's more going on here.
Hmm, yes I think so too. I misread tick_dev_program_event(), it seems
like it Does The Right Thing and I do see the Xen set_next_event hook
get called which I thought wasn't getting called earlier.
Turns out the virtual timer IRQ isn't getting reinitialised before
tick_oneshot_resume runs so we are just missing the interrupt, doh!
---
Subject: xen: resume interrupts before system devices.
otherwise the first timer interrupt after resume is missed and we never
get another.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
diff --git a/drivers/xen/manage.c b/drivers/xen/manage.c
index 0489ea2..5269bb4 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/manage.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/manage.c
@@ -68,15 +68,15 @@ static int xen_suspend(void *data)
gnttab_resume();
xen_mm_unpin_all();
- sysdev_resume();
- device_power_up(PMSG_RESUME);
-
if (!*cancelled) {
xen_irq_resume();
xen_console_resume();
xen_timer_resume();
}
+ sysdev_resume();
+ device_power_up(PMSG_RESUME);
+
return 0;
}
Ian.
>
> J
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-25 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-25 13:40 Ian Campbell
2009-03-25 17:19 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-25 17:46 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2009-03-25 23:40 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-26 13:37 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1238003202.3691.174.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Alex.Zeffertt@citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®