mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, jeremy@goop.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	gregkh@suse.de, okir@suse.de
Subject: Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 16:56:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1242748597.22654.44.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090520002955R.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>

On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 00:30 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> 
> We need these hooks but as I wrote above, they are
> architecture-specific and we should handle them with the architecture
> abstraction (as we handle similar problems) however we can't due to
> dom0 support.

I don't understand this. What exactly about the dom0 support patch
prevents future abstraction here?

The dom0 hooks would simply move into the per-arch abstractions as
appropriate, wouldn't they?

Ian.
-- 
Ian Campbell
Current Noise: Mondo Generator - Simple Exploding Man

"We are on the verge: Today our program proved Fermat's next-to-last theorem."
		-- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982


  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-19 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-14 19:54 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-15 18:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-15 19:59   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-18  1:36 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-18  1:42   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-18  8:40   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-19  5:27     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-19 13:03       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-19 15:30         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-19 15:56           ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2009-05-20 17:06             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-21  8:54               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-21 10:27                 ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 10:28                   ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 10:39                     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-21 11:03                       ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 11:08                         ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 11:19                         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-21 11:45                           ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:15                             ` swiotlb: remove __weak hooks in favour of architecture-specific functions Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:19                               ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:47                               ` Randy Dunlap
2009-05-22  8:55                                 ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-22 11:13                               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-22 11:43                                 ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-22 11:55                                   ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-22 14:02                                     ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-22 14:24                                       ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-21 16:15                             ` [PATCH] swiotlb: make is_buffer_dma_capable architecture-specific Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:15                             ` [PATCH] swiotlb: make range_needs_mapping architecture-specific Ian Campbell
2009-05-22 11:13                               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-22 11:45                                 ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:15                             ` [PATCH] swiotlb/xen: update xen for swiotlb_arch_force_mapping changes Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:15                             ` [PATCH] swiotlb: make swiotlb allocation functions architecture-specific Ian Campbell
2009-05-22 11:13                               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-22 11:46                                 ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:15                             ` [PATCH] swiotlb/xen: update xen for changes to swiotlb allocation interface Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:15                             ` [PATCH] swiotlb: make swiotlb phys<->bus translations architecture-specific Ian Campbell
2009-05-22 11:13                               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-22 11:46                                 ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:15                             ` [PATCH] swiotlb/xen: update xen swiotlb for phys<->bus API changes Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 17:21                             ` [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches? FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-21 10:48                 ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-17 18:37 devzero
2009-05-17 19:25 ` david
2009-05-17 19:33   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-05-17 19:46 devzero
2009-05-18  1:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-19 13:10   ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1242748597.22654.44.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=okir@suse.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®