mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] vm: Document that setting vfs_cache_pressure to 0 isn't a good idea
@ 2009-07-16 16:57 Jan Kara
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2009-07-16 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: LKML, Jan Kara

Reported-by: Christian Thaeter <ct@pipapo.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt |    4 +++-
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

 Andrew, would you merge this please? Thanks.

diff --git a/Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt b/Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt
index c4de635..76e8671 100644
--- a/Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt
+++ b/Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt
@@ -585,7 +585,9 @@ caching of directory and inode objects.
 At the default value of vfs_cache_pressure=100 the kernel will attempt to
 reclaim dentries and inodes at a "fair" rate with respect to pagecache and
 swapcache reclaim.  Decreasing vfs_cache_pressure causes the kernel to prefer
-to retain dentry and inode caches.  Increasing vfs_cache_pressure beyond 100
+to retain dentry and inode caches. When vfs_cache_pressure=0, the kernel will
+never reclaim dentries and inodes due to memory pressure and this can easily
+lead to out-of-memory conditions. Increasing vfs_cache_pressure beyond 100
 causes the kernel to prefer to reclaim dentries and inodes.
 
 ==============================================================
-- 
1.6.0.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-07-16 16:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-16 16:57 [PATCH] vm: Document that setting vfs_cache_pressure to 0 isn't a good idea Jan Kara

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®