Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM sections

[Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 353 bytes --]

On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 08:38 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 06:18:52PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Umm.  (and I'd cc'd you about this privately _last week_)
> 1. I have no trace of that.  Really.
> 2. Did you send it to only me or did also copy Erik?

Just to you.  It could have been auto spam filtered.

cheers, Joe

[-- Attachment #2: Attached message - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM sections --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2099 bytes --]

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM sections
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:31:24 -0700
Message-ID: <1249579883.3467.32.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>

On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 17:40 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > It does add both linux-arm-kernel and linux-arm to section
> > SIMTEC EB2410ITX (BAST).  By the way, another section you
> > maintain, SIMTEC EB110ATX (Chalice CATS), has neither a
> > pattern entry nor a mailing list entry.  Should it?
> 
> I recently had to remove those pattern entries because they were plainly
> wrong (thanks to those who didn't CC anyone in the ARM community with
> those patches.)  EB110ATX != EBSA110.  See ce53895.

I forgot, I did cc the "arm community".
The message was bounced back to me.

cheers, Joe

---------------

Your request to the Linux-arm-kernel mailing list

    Posting of your message titled "[PATCH] MAINTAINERS - arm
patterns?"

has been rejected by the list moderator.  The moderator gave the
following reason for rejecting your request:

"Non-members are not allowed to post messages to this list. You have
to subscribe before you're allowed to post. "