mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sam@ravnborg.org, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	nico@fluxnic.net, tony.luck@intel.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
	mcgrof@gmail.com, jeff@garzik.org, robert.richter@amd.com,
	dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, khali@linux-fr.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] to rebase or not to rebase on linux-next
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:51:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256601061.26028.350.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091026.163050.156983266.davem@davemloft.net>

On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 16:30 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:26:28 -0400
> 
> > I think this is more of a failure in git than in the work flow we
> > present.
> 
> Others (like me) will say you should have let that patch cook for a
> while on the mailing list or in your tree before publishing, in order
> to let those acks and tested-by replies come in.
> 
> That's how I handle this.
> 
> And I really don't buy the argument that you have to publish the
> change in a GIT tree to get those ACKs and tested-by replies.

The thing is, I do my changes with git. I get something working and then
commit it. Then I do more changes and commit that. I don't use quilt
anymore for this.

Then I have an automated process to send out those patches. Heck pushing
it to git makes it _easier_ to do testing. Instead of having someone
pull out 5 or so patches from LKML, they can just pull my git repo and
start testing it.

Yes, I could let it cook on LKML, but I don't have the test suite that
Ingo has either. I do my own set of tests, then I push it out and let
Ingo run it through his test suite.

Some patches get tested by others, some don't. I don't formally ask
anyone to test them besides Ingo. But it is nice to know that someone
tested it, and sometimes I even get people to review it.

So what's the time to leave it out on LKML before pulling it into git?
(which it is already in git for me anyway). I could wait a week, two?
And after pulling it in after this time, I may still get a late
"tested-by" or "reviewed-by".

I think if people knew that they could test or review patches that are
already in git and get acknowledged for doing so, there may be more
people who will test and review patches. Heck, if someone was board,
they could go and review patches already in Linus's tree. I don't think
it would become a new haven for those that want fame, since placing a
tag on a commit is also placing your reputation there too.

-- Steve



  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-26 23:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4ADD0793.3000707@kernel.org>
     [not found] ` <20091020020449.GF24370@core.coreip.homeip.net>
     [not found]   ` <20091020034829.GA12833@elte.hu>
     [not found]     ` <20091020140750.GH11972@erda.amd.com>
     [not found]       ` <alpine.LFD.2.00.0910210654480.5125@eeepc.linux-foundation.org>
     [not found]         ` <20091022122042.e535d43c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
     [not found]           ` <20091023112732.GB5886@elte.hu>
     [not found]             ` <4AE19A74.1090709@garzik.org>
     [not found]               ` <20091023123555.GA25366@elte.hu>
     [not found]                 ` <57C9024A16AD2D4C97DC78E552063EA3E33D0174@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
     [not found]                   ` <20091023134115.GD27097@elte.hu>
     [not found]                     ` <alpine.LFD.2.00.0910231424440.21460@xanadu.home>
     [not found]                       ` <20091023191631.GA1879@elte.hu>
2009-10-23 19:35                         ` [RFC] to rebase or not to rebase on liunx-next Steven Rostedt
2009-10-23 20:37                           ` [RFC] to rebase or not to rebase on linux-next Ingo Molnar
2009-10-23 20:54                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-23 21:59                             ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-10-26 23:26                               ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-26 23:30                                 ` David Miller
2009-10-26 23:51                                   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2009-10-27  0:15                                     ` David Miller
2009-10-27  0:30                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-27  1:34                                         ` David Miller
2009-10-27  3:02                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-27  4:56                                             ` Theodore Tso
2009-10-27  5:18                                             ` David Miller
2009-10-27  8:13                                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-27  9:48                                       ` Catalin Marinas
2009-10-27  7:59                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-27 15:39                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-27 17:18                                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-10-28 15:15                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-28  6:40                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-24  8:03                             ` Theodore Tso
2009-10-24 12:20                               ` Stefan Richter
2009-10-24 19:43                                 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-10-27 19:06                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-27 19:27                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-27 19:39                                     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-10-27 19:43                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-27 19:42                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-26  4:53                               ` Luck, Tony
2009-10-26  5:21                                 ` Theodore Tso
2009-10-26 18:01                                   ` Stefan Richter
2009-10-27 18:07                                     ` Theodore Tso
2009-10-27 18:54                                       ` Stefan Richter
2009-10-28  7:26                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-24 12:51                           ` Stefan Richter
     [not found]                       ` <4AE21839.3000000@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
2009-10-23 21:03                         ` [kernel.org users] Please remember to run 'git gc' on your repositories Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1256601061.26028.350.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®