From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] to rebase or not to rebase on linux-next
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:15:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256742958.26028.1365.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0910271258160.10545@xanadu.home>
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 13:18 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > Sure, but I'm not talking about changing the patch, I'm talking about a
> > late "reviewed by" or "tested-by". These usually do come after a patch
> > set has been moved into the final git push. It would be nice to flag a
> > commit that it was tested by someone.
> >
> [...]
> >
> > My suggestion is to add an "annotation" commit that can tag another
> > commit with something like a "tested-by". This way a tester can say,
> > they tested this particular commit, and if someone changes it, the SHA1
> > will no longer match. And then we can also have a record of what commit
> > was tested by who, after the fact that it went into git.
>
> There is a "git notes" feature from Johan Herland being carried in thepu
> branch of the git repository. I strongly suggest to those who might
> think this could be useful in this context to express their interest by
> posting to git@vger.kernel.org. With a concrete need and usage scenario
> (and offer to help at least with testing) this feature might become
> usable sooner.
>
Thanks for the pointer Nicolas, but it looks like my ideas have already
been NAK'd by Linus.
Oh well,
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-28 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4ADD0793.3000707@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20091020020449.GF24370@core.coreip.homeip.net>
[not found] ` <20091020034829.GA12833@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <20091020140750.GH11972@erda.amd.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.00.0910210654480.5125@eeepc.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20091022122042.e535d43c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
[not found] ` <20091023112732.GB5886@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <4AE19A74.1090709@garzik.org>
[not found] ` <20091023123555.GA25366@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <57C9024A16AD2D4C97DC78E552063EA3E33D0174@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <20091023134115.GD27097@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.00.0910231424440.21460@xanadu.home>
[not found] ` <20091023191631.GA1879@elte.hu>
2009-10-23 19:35 ` [RFC] to rebase or not to rebase on liunx-next Steven Rostedt
2009-10-23 20:37 ` [RFC] to rebase or not to rebase on linux-next Ingo Molnar
2009-10-23 20:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-23 21:59 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-10-26 23:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-26 23:30 ` David Miller
2009-10-26 23:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-27 0:15 ` David Miller
2009-10-27 0:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-27 1:34 ` David Miller
2009-10-27 3:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-27 4:56 ` Theodore Tso
2009-10-27 5:18 ` David Miller
2009-10-27 8:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-27 9:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-10-27 7:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-27 15:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-27 17:18 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-10-28 15:15 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2009-10-28 6:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-24 8:03 ` Theodore Tso
2009-10-24 12:20 ` Stefan Richter
2009-10-24 19:43 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-10-27 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-27 19:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-27 19:39 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-10-27 19:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-27 19:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-26 4:53 ` Luck, Tony
2009-10-26 5:21 ` Theodore Tso
2009-10-26 18:01 ` Stefan Richter
2009-10-27 18:07 ` Theodore Tso
2009-10-27 18:54 ` Stefan Richter
2009-10-28 7:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-24 12:51 ` Stefan Richter
[not found] ` <4AE21839.3000000@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
2009-10-23 21:03 ` [kernel.org users] Please remember to run 'git gc' on your repositories Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1256742958.26028.1365.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®