From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Developers <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: warning: massive change to conditional coding style in net?
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:56:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1259603798.29779.293.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B13A025.7000103@gmail.com>
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 05:36 -0500, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Over the past several days, David Miller (with help from Joe Perches)
> made sweeping changes to the format of conditional statements in the
> net tree -- the equivalent of mass patches that change spaces.
> This makes writing patches for multiple versions of the tree very
> difficult, and will make future pullups problematic.
If it makes getting tcp cookies accepted difficult,
a reversion is simple. That style isn't as important.
I think writing a single set of patches for multiple
versions of linux is not feasible. Feature changes
occur in kernel source daily.
> if (condition
> && condition
> && (condition
> || condition
> || condition)) {
The above is my personally preferred style.
> if (condition &&
> condition && (condition || condition ||
> condition)) {
Except for the odd spacing, this is the significant
majority of net/ style.
The leading style was < 10%. It's less now.
> Miller (with Perches) changed hundreds (thousands?) of these to
> trailing form. This results in a number of hilarious examples --
> lines with both leading and trailing, lines with only &&, etc.
Nearly all existing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-30 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-30 10:36 William Allen Simpson
2009-11-30 13:44 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-30 13:54 ` Alan Cox
2009-11-30 19:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-30 17:56 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2009-12-01 16:08 ` William Allen Simpson
2009-12-01 16:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-01 17:43 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-30 20:36 ` David Miller
2009-12-01 17:56 ` William Allen Simpson
2009-12-01 18:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-01 23:28 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1259603798.29779.293.camel@Joe-Laptop.home \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=william.allen.simpson@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®