From: Michael J Dilmore <michael.j.dilmore@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: jay.vosburgh@canonical.com, vfalico@gmail.com,
andy@greyhouse.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joe@perches.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert BUG_ON to WARN_ON in bond_options.c
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 23:27:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <125b4ae9-2cb7-3532-5391-24404cf6eaec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170621.175651.854625612625047729.davem@davemloft.net>
On 21/06/17 22:56, David Miller wrote:
> From: Michael D <michael.j.dilmore@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 22:41:07 +0100
>
>> I don't think you can stop it being dereferenced... you just need to
>> prevent an attacker from exploiting the null pointer dereference
>> vulnerability right? And this is done by returning the function right
>> away?
> What's all of this about an "attacker"?
>
> If there is a bug, we dererence a NULL pointer, and we should
> fix that bug.
>
> The BUG_ON() helps us see where the problem is while at the
> same time stopping the kernel before the NULL deref happens.
Ok this is starting to make sense now - went a bit off track but think
my general thinking is ok - i.e. if we return the function with an error
code before the dereference then this basically does the same thing as
BUG_ON but without crashing the kernel.
Something like:
if (WARN_ON(!new_active_slave) {
netdev_dbg("Can't add new active slave - pointer null");
return ERROR_CODE
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-21 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-21 18:02 Michael J Dilmore
2017-06-21 18:33 ` Jay Vosburgh
2017-06-21 21:35 ` Michael D
2017-06-21 21:36 ` David Miller
2017-06-21 21:41 ` Michael D
2017-06-21 21:56 ` David Miller
2017-06-21 22:27 ` Michael J Dilmore [this message]
2017-06-21 22:39 ` Jay Vosburgh
2017-06-21 23:04 ` Michael J Dilmore
2017-06-22 8:04 ` Michal Kubecek
2017-06-22 8:14 ` Bjørn Mork
2017-06-21 22:31 ` Jay Vosburgh
2017-06-21 21:57 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=125b4ae9-2cb7-3532-5391-24404cf6eaec@gmail.com \
--to=michael.j.dilmore@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome