From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Cc: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2] acpi: don't cond_resched if irq is disabled
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:46:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1260510373.10543.17.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B20E7B2.1010208@suse.de>
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 20:21 +0800, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Hi Xiaotian,
>
> I think, this is another round of "armor vs. bullet" race... It will hold until
> might_sleep() logic changes again.
>
> Please consider using preemptible() -- IMHO this is the check we should perform
> in our case of voluntary preemption.
preemptible() may not work here because it always returns 0 for
non-preemptible kernel.
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
# define preemptible() (preempt_count() == 0 && !irqs_disabled())
# define IRQ_EXIT_OFFSET (HARDIRQ_OFFSET-1)
#else
# define preemptible() 0
# define IRQ_EXIT_OFFSET HARDIRQ_OFFSET
#endif
Lin Ming
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
>
>
> Xiaotian Feng пишет:
> > commit 8bd108d adds preemption point after each opcode parse, then
> > a sleeping function called from invalid context bug was founded
> > during suspend/resume stage. this was fixed in commit abe1dfa by
> > don't cond_resched when irq_disabled. But recent commit 138d156 changes
> > the behaviour to don't cond_resched when in_atomic. This makes the
> > sleeping function called from invalid context bug happen again, which
> > is reported in http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/1/371.
> >
> > This patch also fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14483
> >
> > Reported-and-bisected-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> > Reported-and-bisected-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
> > Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
> > Cc: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
> > Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > ---
> > include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> > index 9d7febd..0946997 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> > @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static inline void *acpi_os_acquire_object(acpi_cache_t * cache)
> > #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> > #define ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() \
> > do { \
> > - if (!in_atomic_preempt_off()) \
> > + if (!in_atomic_preempt_off() && !irqs_disabled()) \
> > cond_resched(); \
> > } while (0)
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-11 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-04 4:26 [PATCH] ACPICA: don't cond_resched() when irq_disabled or in_atomic Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-04 5:36 ` Zhang Rui
2009-12-04 5:38 ` Zhang Rui
2009-12-04 6:50 ` Justin Mattock
2009-12-04 7:05 ` Danny Feng
2009-12-04 7:27 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-12-09 1:54 ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-10 10:09 ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-10 11:56 ` [PATCH -V2] acpi: don't cond_resched if irq is disabled Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-10 12:21 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-11 5:46 ` Lin Ming [this message]
2009-12-11 11:48 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-11 16:15 ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-11 16:25 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-11 17:34 ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-28 6:02 ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-28 11:12 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2010-01-16 6:44 ` Len Brown
2009-12-10 17:58 ` [PATCH] ACPICA: don't cond_resched() when irq_disabled or in_atomic Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-10 18:18 ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-10 18:37 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-10 22:46 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-12-10 22:54 ` Moore, Robert
2010-01-16 6:46 ` Len Brown
2009-12-11 17:33 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1260510373.10543.17.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com \
--to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
--cc=dfeng@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome