mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Cc: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2] acpi: don't cond_resched if irq is disabled
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:46:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1260510373.10543.17.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B20E7B2.1010208@suse.de>

On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 20:21 +0800, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Hi Xiaotian,
> 
> I think, this is another round of "armor vs. bullet" race... It will hold until
> might_sleep() logic changes again.
> 
> Please consider using preemptible() -- IMHO this is the check we should perform 
> in our case of voluntary preemption.

preemptible() may not work here because it always returns 0 for
non-preemptible kernel.

#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
# define preemptible()  (preempt_count() == 0 && !irqs_disabled())
# define IRQ_EXIT_OFFSET (HARDIRQ_OFFSET-1)
#else
# define preemptible()  0
# define IRQ_EXIT_OFFSET HARDIRQ_OFFSET
#endif

Lin Ming

> 
> Regards,
> Alex.
> 
> 
> Xiaotian Feng пишет:
> > commit 8bd108d adds preemption point after each opcode parse, then
> > a sleeping function called from invalid context bug was founded
> > during suspend/resume stage. this was fixed in commit abe1dfa by
> > don't cond_resched when irq_disabled. But recent commit 138d156 changes
> > the behaviour to don't cond_resched when in_atomic. This makes the
> > sleeping function called from invalid context bug happen again, which
> > is reported in http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/1/371.
> > 
> > This patch also fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14483
> > 
> > Reported-and-bisected-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> > Reported-and-bisected-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
> > Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
> > Cc: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
> > Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > ---
> >  include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> > index 9d7febd..0946997 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> > @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static inline void *acpi_os_acquire_object(acpi_cache_t * cache)
> >  #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> >  #define ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() \
> >  	do { \
> > -		if (!in_atomic_preempt_off()) \
> > +		if (!in_atomic_preempt_off() && !irqs_disabled()) \
> >  			cond_resched(); \
> >  	} while (0)
> >  
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-11  6:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-04  4:26 [PATCH] ACPICA: don't cond_resched() when irq_disabled or in_atomic Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-04  5:36 ` Zhang Rui
2009-12-04  5:38   ` Zhang Rui
2009-12-04  6:50 ` Justin Mattock
2009-12-04  7:05   ` Danny Feng
2009-12-04  7:27     ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-12-09  1:54       ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-10 10:09 ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-10 11:56   ` [PATCH -V2] acpi: don't cond_resched if irq is disabled Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-10 12:21     ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-11  5:46       ` Lin Ming [this message]
2009-12-11 11:48         ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-11 16:15           ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-11 16:25             ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-11 17:34               ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-28  6:02                 ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-28 11:12                   ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2010-01-16  6:44                     ` Len Brown
2009-12-10 17:58   ` [PATCH] ACPICA: don't cond_resched() when irq_disabled or in_atomic Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-10 18:18     ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-10 18:37       ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-10 22:46         ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-12-10 22:54           ` Moore, Robert
2010-01-16  6:46             ` Len Brown
2009-12-11 17:33         ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1260510373.10543.17.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com \
    --to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
    --cc=dfeng@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome