mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] kgdb,x86: do not set kgdb_single_step on x86
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:36:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1260545777-8089-8-git-send-email-jason.wessel@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260545777-8089-7-git-send-email-jason.wessel@windriver.com>

On an SMP system the kgdb_single_step flag has the possibility to
indefinitely hang the system in the case.  Consider the case where,
CPU 1 has the schedule lock and CPU 0 is set to single step, there is
no way for CPU 0 to run another task.

The easy way to observe the problem is to make 2 cpus busy, and run
the kgdb test suite.  You will see that it hangs the system very
quickly.

while [ 1 ] ; do find /proc > /dev/null 2>&1 ; done &
while [ 1 ] ; do find /proc > /dev/null 2>&1 ; done &
echo V1 > /sys/module/kgdbts/parameters/kgdbts

The side effect of this patch is that there is the possibility
to miss a breakpoint in the case that a single step operation
was executed to step over a breakpoint in common code.

The trade off of the missed breakpoint is preferred to
hanging the kernel.  This can be fixed in the future by
using kprobes or another strategy to step over planted
breakpoints with out of line execution.

CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c |    1 -
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c
index aefae46..dd74fe7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c
@@ -400,7 +400,6 @@ int kgdb_arch_handle_exception(int e_vector, int signo, int err_code,
 		/* set the trace bit if we're stepping */
 		if (remcomInBuffer[0] == 's') {
 			linux_regs->flags |= X86_EFLAGS_TF;
-			kgdb_single_step = 1;
 			atomic_set(&kgdb_cpu_doing_single_step,
 				   raw_smp_processor_id());
 		}
-- 
1.6.4.rc1


  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-11 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-11 15:36 [GIT PULL] kgdb 2.6.33 Jason Wessel
2009-12-11 15:36 ` [PATCH 1/9] kgdb,x86: remove redundant test Jason Wessel
2009-12-11 15:36   ` [PATCH 2/9] kgdb: Read buffer overflow Jason Wessel
2009-12-11 15:36     ` [PATCH 3/9] kgdbts: " Jason Wessel
2009-12-11 15:36       ` [PATCH 4/9] kgdb: Replace strstr() by strchr() for single-character needles Jason Wessel
2009-12-11 15:36         ` [PATCH 5/9] kgdb,i386: Fix corner case access to ss with NMI watch dog exception Jason Wessel
2009-12-11 15:36           ` [PATCH 6/9] kgdb: allow for cpu switch when single stepping Jason Wessel
2009-12-11 15:36             ` Jason Wessel [this message]
2009-12-11 15:36               ` [PATCH 8/9] kgdb: continue and warn on signal passing from gdb Jason Wessel
2009-12-11 15:36                 ` [PATCH 9/9] kgdb: Always process the whole breakpoint list on activate or deactivate Jason Wessel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1260545777-8089-8-git-send-email-jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --to=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®