From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: [PATCH] hvc_console: Fix a race between hvc_close and hvc_remove
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:16:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1267184786-4377-1-git-send-email-amit.shah@redhat.com> (raw)
Alan pointed out a race in the code where hvc_remove is invoked. The
recent virtio_console work is the first user of hvc_remove().
Alan describes it thus:
The hvc_console assumes that a close and remove call can't occur at the
same time.
In addition tty_hangup(tty) is problematic as tty_hangup is asynchronous
itself....
So this can happen
hvc_close hvc_remove
hung up ? - no
lock
tty = hp->tty
unlock
lock
hp->tty = NULL
unlock
notify del
kref_put the hvc struct
close completes
tty is destroyed
tty_hangup dead tty
tty->ops will be NULL
NULL->...
This patch adds some tty krefs and also converts to using tty_vhangup()
before putting the tty kref.
Reported-by: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
---
I can't be sure if this is all that's needed. tty people, please take
a look!
drivers/char/hvc_console.c | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/hvc_console.c b/drivers/char/hvc_console.c
index d8dac58..3983e32 100644
--- a/drivers/char/hvc_console.c
+++ b/drivers/char/hvc_console.c
@@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ static struct hvc_struct *hvc_get_by_index(int index)
spin_lock_irqsave(&hp->lock, flags);
if (hp->index == index) {
kref_get(&hp->kref);
+ tty_kref_get(hp->tty);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);
spin_unlock(&hvc_structs_lock);
return hp;
@@ -390,6 +391,7 @@ static void hvc_close(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file * filp)
}
kref_put(&hp->kref, destroy_hvc_struct);
+ tty_kref_put(tty);
}
static void hvc_hangup(struct tty_struct *tty)
@@ -806,6 +808,7 @@ int hvc_remove(struct hvc_struct *hp)
unsigned long flags;
struct tty_struct *tty;
+ tty_kref_get(hp->tty);
spin_lock_irqsave(&hp->lock, flags);
tty = hp->tty;
@@ -830,7 +833,9 @@ int hvc_remove(struct hvc_struct *hp)
* cleaned up the hvc_struct.
*/
if (tty)
- tty_hangup(tty);
+ tty_vhangup(tty);
+
+ tty_kref_put(hp->tty);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hvc_remove);
--
1.6.2.5
next reply other threads:[~2010-02-26 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-26 11:46 Amit Shah [this message]
2010-02-27 1:33 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1267184786-4377-1-git-send-email-amit.shah@redhat.com \
--to=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®