From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.33: ftrace triggers soft lockup
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:18:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1267672706.10871.97.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2375c9f91003031901v19c00c21k4a5d46bbe9ade3f@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 11:01 +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
> >
> > So it is stuck in stop machine. I wonder where exactly. I see some do_exit
> > at the top but I wonder how much they are reliable.
>
> Well, I think 'kstop' is just random, sometimes I got 'watchdog' or some other
> process.
>
> >
> > Anyway, as Steve said, we really need a full config to reproduce it.
> >
>
> Done in another reply.
Thanks!
Frederic, I notice that lockdep is on, did anything change that might
slow down the code in lockdep, or is the function graph tracer doing
more locking?
I'm betting that we are hitting a live lock. That is, an interrupt goes
off, it is being traced, and the function graph is tracing it, but some
locking is happening (although it also tracks disabling of interrupts)
and this slows the interrupt handler down enough that when it finishes,
another interrupt goes off.
Américo,
Could you disable LOCKDEP and see if you still encounter this lockup?
Thanks,
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-04 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-03 6:04 Américo Wang
2010-03-03 13:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-04 2:58 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-04 1:33 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-04 1:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04 3:01 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-04 3:18 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2010-03-04 4:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04 5:10 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-04 5:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04 13:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-05 4:14 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-05 7:16 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-05 15:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-05 17:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-05 18:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-05 18:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-05 19:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-08 7:32 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-08 15:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-09 2:11 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-09 2:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-09 3:38 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-12 19:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-12 21:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13 2:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13 5:37 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-13 5:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-14 16:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13 17:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-15 1:46 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-15 14:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-15 16:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-08 2:31 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-09 2:40 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-09 2:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-09 5:06 ` Américo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1267672706.10871.97.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®