mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6.33: ftrace triggers soft lockup
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:40:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2375c9f91003081840w5419d847q8ffd8b6ce46d86fb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2375c9f91003071831x4104dd8dp82967c0409391bd5@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>>
>> Now some things you can do to help performance. One is not to trace
>> functions that are known to have a high hit rate. You can do this with
>> the set_ftrace_notrace file, or add "ftrace_notrace=func1,func2,func3"
>> to the command line where func1,func2,func3 are the functions you do not
>> want to trace. This just adds these by default to the set_ftrace_notrace
>> and can be removed at runtime.
>>
>>
>> The functions I commonly write to are:
>>
>> echo '*spin_lock*' '*spin_unlock*' '*spin_try*' '*rcu_read*' > set_ftace_notrace
>>
>> since these functions are hit quite intensively, by not tracing them it
>> helps a bit with performance.
>
> I will try this now.
>

Unfortunately, this doesn't help.

What is worse, I got another soft lockup, although I already turned LOCKDEP off.


Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-09  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-03  6:04 Américo Wang
2010-03-03 13:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-04  2:58   ` Américo Wang
2010-03-04  1:33 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-04  1:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04  3:01   ` Américo Wang
2010-03-04  3:18     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-04  4:06       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04  5:10       ` Américo Wang
2010-03-04  5:18         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04 13:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-05  4:14   ` Américo Wang
2010-03-05  7:16     ` Américo Wang
2010-03-05 15:06       ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-05 17:16         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-05 18:35           ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-05 18:43             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-05 19:07               ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-08  7:32           ` Li Zefan
2010-03-08 15:15             ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-09  2:11               ` Li Zefan
2010-03-09  2:23                 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-09  3:38                   ` Li Zefan
2010-03-12 19:20                     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-12 21:38                       ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13  2:07                     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13  5:37                       ` Américo Wang
2010-03-13  5:51                         ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-14 16:55                         ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13 17:56                       ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-15  1:46                         ` Li Zefan
2010-03-15 14:39                           ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-15 16:16                             ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-08  2:31         ` Américo Wang
2010-03-09  2:40           ` Américo Wang [this message]
2010-03-09  2:51             ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-09  5:06               ` Américo Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2375c9f91003081840w5419d847q8ffd8b6ce46d86fb@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®