From: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6.33: ftrace triggers soft lockup
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:40:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2375c9f91003081840w5419d847q8ffd8b6ce46d86fb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2375c9f91003071831x4104dd8dp82967c0409391bd5@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>>
>> Now some things you can do to help performance. One is not to trace
>> functions that are known to have a high hit rate. You can do this with
>> the set_ftrace_notrace file, or add "ftrace_notrace=func1,func2,func3"
>> to the command line where func1,func2,func3 are the functions you do not
>> want to trace. This just adds these by default to the set_ftrace_notrace
>> and can be removed at runtime.
>>
>>
>> The functions I commonly write to are:
>>
>> echo '*spin_lock*' '*spin_unlock*' '*spin_try*' '*rcu_read*' > set_ftace_notrace
>>
>> since these functions are hit quite intensively, by not tracing them it
>> helps a bit with performance.
>
> I will try this now.
>
Unfortunately, this doesn't help.
What is worse, I got another soft lockup, although I already turned LOCKDEP off.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-09 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-03 6:04 Américo Wang
2010-03-03 13:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-04 2:58 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-04 1:33 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-04 1:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04 3:01 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-04 3:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-04 4:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04 5:10 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-04 5:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04 13:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-05 4:14 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-05 7:16 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-05 15:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-05 17:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-05 18:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-05 18:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-05 19:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-08 7:32 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-08 15:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-09 2:11 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-09 2:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-09 3:38 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-12 19:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-12 21:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13 2:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13 5:37 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-13 5:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-14 16:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13 17:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-15 1:46 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-15 14:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-15 16:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-08 2:31 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-09 2:40 ` Américo Wang [this message]
2010-03-09 2:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-09 5:06 ` Américo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2375c9f91003081840w5419d847q8ffd8b6ce46d86fb@mail.gmail.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®