mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	kernel-team <kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION 2.6.30][PATCH v3] sched: update load count only once per cpu in 10 tick update window
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:08:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271934490.1776.343.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271200751-18697-1-git-send-email-chase.douglas@canonical.com>

On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 16:19 -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
> 
> There's a period of 10 ticks where calc_load_tasks is updated by all the
> cpus for the load avg. Usually all the cpus do this during the first
> tick. If any cpus go idle, calc_load_tasks is decremented accordingly.
> However, if they wake up calc_load_tasks is not incremented. Thus, if
> cpus go idle during the 10 tick period, calc_load_tasks may be
> decremented to a non-representative value. This issue can lead to
> systems having a load avg of exactly 0, even though the real load avg
> could theoretically be up to NR_CPUS.
> 
> This change defers calc_load_tasks accounting after each cpu updates the
> count until after the 10 tick update window.
> 
> A few points:
> 
> * A global atomic deferral counter, and not per-cpu vars, is needed
>   because a cpu may go NOHZ idle and not be able to update the global
>   calc_load_tasks variable for subsequent load calculations.
> * It is not enough to add calls to account for the load when a cpu is
>   awakened:
>   - Load avg calculation must be independent of cpu load.
>   - If a cpu is awakend by one tasks, but then has more scheduled before
>     the end of the update window, only the first task will be accounted.
> 

Ok, so delaying the whole ILB angle for now, the below is a similar
approach to yours but with a more explicit code flow.

Does that work for you?

---
 kernel/sched.c          |   80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 kernel/sched_idletask.c |    3 +-
 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 95eaecc..8ac02a9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1815,7 +1815,7 @@ static void cfs_rq_set_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, unsigned long shares)
 }
 #endif
 
-static void calc_load_account_active(struct rq *this_rq);
+static void calc_load_account_idle(struct rq *this_rq);
 static void update_sysctl(void);
 static int get_update_sysctl_factor(void);
 
@@ -2907,6 +2907,61 @@ static unsigned long calc_load_update;
 unsigned long avenrun[3];
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(avenrun);
 
+static long calc_load_fold_active(struct rq *this_rq)
+{
+	long nr_active, delta = 0;
+
+	nr_active = this_rq->nr_running;
+	nr_active += (long) this_rq->nr_uninterruptible;
+
+	if (nr_active != this_rq->calc_load_active) {
+		delta = nr_active - this_rq->calc_load_active;
+		this_rq->calc_load_active = nr_active;
+	}
+
+	return delta;
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
+/*
+ * For NO_HZ we delay the active fold to the next LOAD_FREQ update.
+ *
+ * When making the ILB scale, we should try to pull this in as well.
+ */
+static atomic_long_t calc_load_tasks_idle;
+
+static void calc_load_account_idle(struct rq *this_rq)
+{
+	long delta;
+       
+	delta = calc_load_fold_active(this_rq);
+	if (delta)
+		atomic_long_add(delta, &calc_load_tasks_idle);
+}
+
+static long calc_load_fold_idle(void)
+{
+	long delta = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Its got a race, we don't care...
+	 */
+	if (atomic_long_read(&calc_load_tasks_idle))
+		delta = atomic_long_xchg(&calc_load_tasks_idle, 0);
+
+	return delta;
+}
+#else
+static void calc_load_account_idle(struct rq *this_rq)
+{
+}
+
+static inline long calc_load_fold_idle(void)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
 /**
  * get_avenrun - get the load average array
  * @loads:	pointer to dest load array
@@ -2953,20 +3008,22 @@ void calc_global_load(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * Either called from update_cpu_load() or from a cpu going idle
+ * Called from update_cpu_load() to periodically update this CPU's
+ * active count.
  */
 static void calc_load_account_active(struct rq *this_rq)
 {
-	long nr_active, delta;
+	long delta;
 
-	nr_active = this_rq->nr_running;
-	nr_active += (long) this_rq->nr_uninterruptible;
+	if (time_before(jiffies, this_rq->calc_load_update))
+		return;
 
-	if (nr_active != this_rq->calc_load_active) {
-		delta = nr_active - this_rq->calc_load_active;
-		this_rq->calc_load_active = nr_active;
+	delta  = calc_load_fold_active(this_rq);
+	delta += calc_load_fold_idle();
+	if (delta)
 		atomic_long_add(delta, &calc_load_tasks);
-	}
+
+	this_rq->calc_load_update += LOAD_FREQ;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2998,10 +3055,7 @@ static void update_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq)
 		this_rq->cpu_load[i] = (old_load*(scale-1) + new_load) >> i;
 	}
 
-	if (time_after_eq(jiffies, this_rq->calc_load_update)) {
-		this_rq->calc_load_update += LOAD_FREQ;
-		calc_load_account_active(this_rq);
-	}
+	calc_load_account_active(this_rq);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/kernel/sched_idletask.c b/kernel/sched_idletask.c
index bea2b8f..9fa0f40 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_idletask.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_idletask.c
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int fl
 static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_idle(struct rq *rq)
 {
 	schedstat_inc(rq, sched_goidle);
-	/* adjust the active tasks as we might go into a long sleep */
-	calc_load_account_active(rq);
+	calc_load_account_idle(rq);
 	return rq->idle;
 }
 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-22 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-13 23:19 Chase Douglas
2010-04-19 18:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 18:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 20:16   ` Chase Douglas
2010-04-19 20:52     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 21:17       ` Chase Douglas
2010-04-22 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-04-22 13:18   ` Chase Douglas
2010-04-22 15:35     ` Chase Douglas
2010-04-23 10:49   ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Cure load average vs NO_HZ woes tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1271934490.1776.343.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chase.douglas@canonical.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®