From: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION 2.6.30][PATCH v3] sched: update load count only once per cpu in 10 tick update window
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:35:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u2l40ec3ea41004220835m25e0f6c8v7a8ea7fabe756dc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x2j40ec3ea41004220618sd05bca74pea1180862e7b0907@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Chase Douglas
<chase.douglas@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 16:19 -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
>>>
>>> There's a period of 10 ticks where calc_load_tasks is updated by all the
>>> cpus for the load avg. Usually all the cpus do this during the first
>>> tick. If any cpus go idle, calc_load_tasks is decremented accordingly.
>>> However, if they wake up calc_load_tasks is not incremented. Thus, if
>>> cpus go idle during the 10 tick period, calc_load_tasks may be
>>> decremented to a non-representative value. This issue can lead to
>>> systems having a load avg of exactly 0, even though the real load avg
>>> could theoretically be up to NR_CPUS.
>>>
>>> This change defers calc_load_tasks accounting after each cpu updates the
>>> count until after the 10 tick update window.
>>>
>>> A few points:
>>>
>>> * A global atomic deferral counter, and not per-cpu vars, is needed
>>> because a cpu may go NOHZ idle and not be able to update the global
>>> calc_load_tasks variable for subsequent load calculations.
>>> * It is not enough to add calls to account for the load when a cpu is
>>> awakened:
>>> - Load avg calculation must be independent of cpu load.
>>> - If a cpu is awakend by one tasks, but then has more scheduled before
>>> the end of the update window, only the first task will be accounted.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, so delaying the whole ILB angle for now, the below is a similar
>> approach to yours but with a more explicit code flow.
>>
>> Does that work for you?
>
> This looks good. I'll run my test case to make sure it fixes the
> scenario we hit, and then I'll ack it when I've confirmed it works.
I've run my test case and it seems to push the load avg numbers as expected.
Acked-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
BTW, I noticed some trailing whitespace, so I ran it through checkpatch.pl:
ERROR: trailing whitespace
#44: FILE: kernel/sched.c:2936:
+ $
Thanks
-- Chase
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-22 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-13 23:19 Chase Douglas
2010-04-19 18:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 18:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 20:16 ` Chase Douglas
2010-04-19 20:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 21:17 ` Chase Douglas
2010-04-22 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-22 13:18 ` Chase Douglas
2010-04-22 15:35 ` Chase Douglas [this message]
2010-04-23 10:49 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Cure load average vs NO_HZ woes tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=u2l40ec3ea41004220835m25e0f6c8v7a8ea7fabe756dc@mail.gmail.com \
--to=chase.douglas@canonical.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®