mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Pekka Paalanen <pq@iki.fi>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] tracing: Allow mmio tracer to display trace_printk() and other events
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 11:11:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273763483.27703.991.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100513152915.3d3f852b@daedalus.pq.iki.fi>

On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 15:29 +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Thu, 13 May 2010 08:15:09 -0400

> > It only displays other events if the user enabled those events.
> > 
> > But that said, I don't want to break existing userspace tools. I
> > can add a mmiotrace option "mmiotrace_all_events", if the user
> > wants to see all events within the mmiotracer then they can just
> > enable that option, otherwise, the mmiotracer will act like it
> > currently does.
> > 
> > How does that sound?
> 
> That would be fine. Is it not redundant with what you said in
> your first sentence?
> 

Right now with this patch as is. When you enable the mmiotracer it
clears the ring buffer. But if someone previously enabled an event (like
sched_switch for example) then that event will appear in the output of
the tracer.

The user will need to disable that event and restart the mmiotracer so
the output will not break the userspace tools. Is this OK?

If not, then my suggestion is to have an mmiotracer option that keeps it
from printing out any event except for the ones it knows about.

The reason I added this patch in the first place was because Larry
Finger was using the mmiotrace with trace_printk() and the current code
does not print out the trace_printk() when mmiotracer is active.

-- Steve



  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-13 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-13  1:21 [PATCH 0/4] [GIT PULL] tracing: updates Steven Rostedt
2010-05-13  1:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] tracing: Fix function declarations if !CONFIG_STACKTRACE Steven Rostedt
2010-05-13  1:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] tracing/sched: Fix task states in sched switch event Steven Rostedt
2010-05-13  6:15   ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-13  1:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] tracing: Allow mmio tracer to display trace_printk() and other events Steven Rostedt
2010-05-13  8:54   ` Pekka Paalanen
2010-05-13 12:15     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-13 12:29       ` Pekka Paalanen
2010-05-13 15:11         ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2010-05-13 19:42           ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-15  7:46           ` Pekka Paalanen
2010-05-16  1:29             ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-13  1:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] tracing: Update branch trace to new event API Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1273763483.27703.991.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pq@iki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®