mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 00/10] V2: rwsem changes + down_read_unfair() proposal
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 05:39:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273840782-5920-1-git-send-email-walken@google.com> (raw)

I would like to sollicit comments regarding the following changes
against 2.6.34-rc7 + 91af708 (from V1 proposal) already applied.

The motivation for this change was some cluster monitoring software we
use at google; which reads /proc/<pid>/maps files for all running
processes. When the machines are under load, the mmap_sem is often
acquire for reads for long periods of time since do_page_fault() holds
it while doing disk accesses; and fair queueing behavior often ends up
in the monitoring software making little progress. By introducing
unfair behavior in a few selected places, are are able to let the
monitoring software make progress without impacting performance for
the rest of the system.

In general, I've made sure to implement this proposal without touching
the rwsem fast paths. Also, the first 8 patches of this series should
be of general applicability even if not taking the down_read_unfair()
changes, addressing minor issues such as situations where reader
threads can get blocked at the head of the waiting list even though
the rwsem is currently owned for reads.

Changes since v1:
- Keep the active count check when trying to wake readers in the up_xxxx()
  slow path (I had suppressed it in v1). However, I did try to lighten the
  check (this is patch 3 of the series).
- Added priviledge check before making use of unfair behavior in
  /proc/<pid>/exe and /proc/<pid>/maps files.
- Applied David Howell's many small suggestions (I hope I did not miss any).

Michel Lespinasse (10):
  x86 rwsem: minor cleanups
  rwsem: fully separate code pathes to wake writers vs readers
  rwsem: lighter active count checks when waking up readers
  rwsem: let RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS represent any number of waiting threads
  rwsem: wake queued readers when writer blocks on active read lock
  rwsem: smaller wrappers around rwsem_down_failed_common
  generic rwsem: implement down_read_unfair
  rwsem: down_read_unfair infrastructure support
  x86 rwsem: down_read_unfair implementation
  Use down_read_unfair() for /sys/<pid>/exe and /sys/<pid>/maps files

 arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h   |   70 ++++++++++++-----
 arch/x86/lib/rwsem_64.S        |   14 +++-
 arch/x86/lib/semaphore_32.S    |   21 +++++-
 fs/proc/base.c                 |    2 +-
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c             |    2 +-
 fs/proc/task_nommu.c           |    2 +-
 include/linux/capability.h     |    1 +
 include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h |   10 ++-
 include/linux/rwsem.h          |   13 +++
 kernel/rwsem.c                 |   31 ++++++++
 lib/rwsem-spinlock.c           |   10 ++-
 lib/rwsem.c                    |  160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 12 files changed, 247 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)


             reply	other threads:[~2010-05-14 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-14 12:39 Michel Lespinasse [this message]
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86 rwsem: minor cleanups Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 02/10] rwsem: fully separate code pathes to wake writers vs readers Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 03/10] rwsem: lighter active count checks when waking up readers Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 04/10] rwsem: let RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS represent any number of waiting threads Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 05/10] rwsem: wake queued readers when writer blocks on active read lock Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 06/10] rwsem: smaller wrappers around rwsem_down_failed_common Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 07/10] generic rwsem: implement down_read_unfair Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 08/10] rwsem: down_read_unfair infrastructure support Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 09/10] x86 rwsem: down_read_unfair implementation Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 10/10] Use down_read_unfair() for /sys/<pid>/exe and /sys/<pid>/maps files Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 15:13 ` [PATCH 00/10] V2: rwsem changes + down_read_unfair() proposal Linus Torvalds
2010-05-17 21:28   ` Michel Lespinasse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1273840782-5920-1-git-send-email-walken@google.com \
    --to=walken@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suleiman@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®