From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] Use down_read_unfair() for /sys/<pid>/exe and /sys/<pid>/maps files
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 05:39:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273840782-5920-11-git-send-email-walken@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273840782-5920-1-git-send-email-walken@google.com>
This helps in the following situation:
- Thread A takes a page fault while reading or writing memory.
do_page_fault() acquires the mmap_sem for read and blocks on disk
(either reading the page from file, or hitting swap) for a long time.
- Thread B does an mmap call and blocks trying to acquire the mmap_sem
for write
- Thread C is a monitoring process trying to read every /proc/pid/maps
in the system. This requires acquiring the mmap_sem for read. Thread C
blocks behind B, waiting for A to release the rwsem. If thread C
could be allowed to run in parallel with A, it would probably get done
long before thread A's disk access completes, thus not actually slowing
down thread B.
The unfair behavior is restricted to processes with the CAP_SYS_NICE
capability in order to avoid possible DoS attacks.
Test results with down_read_unfair_test (10 seconds):
2.6.33.3:
threadA completes ~600 faults
threadB completes ~300 mmap/munmap cycles
threadC completes ~600 /proc/pid/maps reads
2.6.33.3 + down_read_unfair:
threadA completes ~600 faults
threadB completes ~300 mmap/munmap cycles
threadC completes ~160000 /proc/pid/maps reads
Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 2 +-
fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 2 +-
fs/proc/task_nommu.c | 2 +-
include/linux/capability.h | 1 +
include/linux/rwsem.h | 3 +++
kernel/rwsem.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 8418fcc..9941802 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ struct file *get_mm_exe_file(struct mm_struct *mm)
/* We need mmap_sem to protect against races with removal of
* VM_EXECUTABLE vmas */
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ down_read_unfair_if_nice_capable(&mm->mmap_sem);
exe_file = mm->exe_file;
if (exe_file)
get_file(exe_file);
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 0705534..47127e7 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static void *m_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
mm = mm_for_maps(priv->task);
if (!mm)
return NULL;
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ down_read_unfair_if_nice_capable(&mm->mmap_sem);
tail_vma = get_gate_vma(priv->task);
priv->tail_vma = tail_vma;
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_nommu.c b/fs/proc/task_nommu.c
index 46d4b5d..af87191 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_nommu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_nommu.c
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static void *m_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
priv->task = NULL;
return NULL;
}
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ down_read_unfair_if_nice_capable(&mm->mmap_sem);
/* start from the Nth VMA */
for (p = rb_first(&mm->mm_rb); p; p = rb_next(p))
diff --git a/include/linux/capability.h b/include/linux/capability.h
index 39e5ff5..de003dc 100644
--- a/include/linux/capability.h
+++ b/include/linux/capability.h
@@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ struct cpu_vfs_cap_data {
processes and setting the scheduling algorithm used by another
process. */
/* Allow setting cpu affinity on other processes */
+/* Allow unfair rwsem read acquire with down_read_unfair_if_nice_capable() */
#define CAP_SYS_NICE 23
diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem.h b/include/linux/rwsem.h
index 0d3310b..1322ee5 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwsem.h
@@ -32,9 +32,12 @@ extern void down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
*/
#ifdef __HAVE_DOWN_READ_UNFAIR
extern void down_read_unfair(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void down_read_unfair_if_nice_capable(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
#else
static inline void down_read_unfair(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{ down_read(sem); }
+static inline void down_read_unfair_if_nice_capable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ { down_read(sem); }
#endif
/*
diff --git a/kernel/rwsem.c b/kernel/rwsem.c
index d7b424b..2c51880 100644
--- a/kernel/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/rwsem.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/capability.h>
#include <linux/rwsem.h>
#include <asm/system.h>
@@ -41,6 +42,19 @@ void __sched down_read_unfair(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_read_unfair);
+void __sched down_read_unfair_if_nice_capable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ int unfair = capable(CAP_SYS_NICE);
+
+ might_sleep();
+ rwsem_acquire_read(&sem->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
+
+ LOCK_CONTENDED(sem, __down_read_trylock,
+ (unfair ? __down_read_unfair : __down_read));
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_read_unfair_if_nice_capable);
+
#endif
/*
--
1.7.0.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-14 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-14 12:39 [PATCH 00/10] V2: rwsem changes + down_read_unfair() proposal Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86 rwsem: minor cleanups Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 02/10] rwsem: fully separate code pathes to wake writers vs readers Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 03/10] rwsem: lighter active count checks when waking up readers Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 04/10] rwsem: let RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS represent any number of waiting threads Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 05/10] rwsem: wake queued readers when writer blocks on active read lock Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 06/10] rwsem: smaller wrappers around rwsem_down_failed_common Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 07/10] generic rwsem: implement down_read_unfair Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 08/10] rwsem: down_read_unfair infrastructure support Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` [PATCH 09/10] x86 rwsem: down_read_unfair implementation Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-14 12:39 ` Michel Lespinasse [this message]
2010-05-14 15:13 ` [PATCH 00/10] V2: rwsem changes + down_read_unfair() proposal Linus Torvalds
2010-05-17 21:28 ` Michel Lespinasse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1273840782-5920-11-git-send-email-walken@google.com \
--to=walken@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®