* [PATCH] x86:hpet.c: Changed delayed_work to work when delay is 0
@ 2010-05-15 15:15 Leonardo de Sá Alt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Leonardo de Sá Alt @ 2010-05-15 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: venkatesh.pallipadi; +Cc: linux-kernel, Leonardo de Sá Alt
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1019 bytes --]
Here a delayed_work was used with delay 0, so it was changed to work.
It avoids a timer set up and the work is directly queued, providing
less use of memory and more performance.
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Sá Alt <leonardoaltt@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c | 6 ++----
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
index a198b7c..4516ba1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
@@ -724,12 +724,10 @@ static int hpet_cpuhp_notify(struct notifier_block *n,
switch (action & 0xf) {
case CPU_ONLINE:
- INIT_DELAYED_WORK_ON_STACK(&work.work, hpet_work);
+ INIT_WORK_ON_STACK(&work.work.work, hpet_work);
init_completion(&work.complete);
- /* FIXME: add schedule_work_on() */
- schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, &work.work, 0);
+ schedule_work_on(cpu, &work.work.work);
wait_for_completion(&work.complete);
- destroy_timer_on_stack(&work.work.timer);
break;
case CPU_DEAD:
if (hdev) {
--
1.6.0.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCH] x86, hpet.c: Changed delayed_work to work when delay is 0
@ 2010-05-15 15:27 Leonardo de Sá Alt
2010-05-18 1:36 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Leonardo de Sá Alt @ 2010-05-15 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo; +Cc: linux-kernel, Leonardo de Sá Alt
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1197 bytes --]
Here a delayed_work was used with delay 0, so it was changed to work.
It avoids a timer set up and the work is directly queued, providing
less use of memory and more performance.
I've tried to send this patch to Venkatesh Pallipadi, the creator of the code I changed (venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com), but "the message was rejected by the recipient domain".
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Sá Alt <leonardoaltt@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c | 6 ++----
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
index a198b7c..4516ba1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
@@ -724,12 +724,10 @@ static int hpet_cpuhp_notify(struct notifier_block *n,
switch (action & 0xf) {
case CPU_ONLINE:
- INIT_DELAYED_WORK_ON_STACK(&work.work, hpet_work);
+ INIT_WORK_ON_STACK(&work.work.work, hpet_work);
init_completion(&work.complete);
- /* FIXME: add schedule_work_on() */
- schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, &work.work, 0);
+ schedule_work_on(cpu, &work.work.work);
wait_for_completion(&work.complete);
- destroy_timer_on_stack(&work.work.timer);
break;
case CPU_DEAD:
if (hdev) {
--
1.6.0.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] x86, hpet.c: Changed delayed_work to work when delay is 0
2010-05-15 15:27 [PATCH] x86, hpet.c: " Leonardo de Sá Alt
@ 2010-05-18 1:36 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Venkatesh Pallipadi @ 2010-05-18 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leonardo de Sá Alt; +Cc: mingo, linux-kernel
Thanks for sending the patch.
A comment below.
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Leonardo de Sá Alt
<leonardoaltt@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here a delayed_work was used with delay 0, so it was changed to work.
> It avoids a timer set up and the work is directly queued, providing
> less use of memory and more performance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Sá Alt <leonardoaltt@gmail.com>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c | 6 ++----
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
> index a198b7c..4516ba1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
> @@ -724,12 +724,10 @@ static int hpet_cpuhp_notify(struct notifier_block *n,
>
> switch (action & 0xf) {
> case CPU_ONLINE:
> - INIT_DELAYED_WORK_ON_STACK(&work.work, hpet_work);
> + INIT_WORK_ON_STACK(&work.work.work, hpet_work);
Can you also change work in hpet_work_struct to work_struct. That
should make things a bit more cleaner.
Thanks,
Venki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-18 1:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-15 15:15 [PATCH] x86:hpet.c: Changed delayed_work to work when delay is 0 Leonardo de Sá Alt
2010-05-15 15:27 [PATCH] x86, hpet.c: " Leonardo de Sá Alt
2010-05-18 1:36 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®