From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: "William A. (Andy) Adamson" <androsadamson@gmail.com>
Cc: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, salvet@ics.muni.cz
Subject: Re: Deadlock in NFSv4 in all kernels
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 10:04:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1274796270.5377.48.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimsQTYWndbQo2nU01pcJfTRSZlPCMEY8m-CnksM@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 09:45 -0400, William A. (Andy) Adamson wrote:
> 2010/5/7 Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I encountered the following problem. We use short expiration time for
> > kerberos contexts created by rpc.gssd (some patches were included in mainline
> > nfs-utils). In particular, we use 120secs expiration time.
> >
> > Now, I run application that eats 80% of available RAM. Then I run 10 parallel
> > dd processes that write data into NFS4 volume with sec=krb5.
> >
> > As soon as the kerberos context expires (i.e., up to 120 secs), the whole
> > system gets stuck in do_page_fault and succesive functions. It is because
> > there is no free memory in kernel, all free memory is used as cache for NFS4
> > (due to dd traffic), kernel ask NFS to write back its pages but NFS cannot do
> > anything as it is missing valid context. NFS contacts rpc.gssd to provide
> > a renewed context, the rpc.gssd does not provide the context as it needs some memory
> > to scan /tmp for a ticket. I.e., it deadlocks.
> >
> > Longer context expiration time is no real solution as it only makes the
> > deadlock less often.
> >
> > Any ideas what can be done here?
>
> Not get into the problem in the first place: this means
>
> 1) determine a 'lead time' where the NFS client declares a context
> expired even though it really as 'lead time' until it actually
> expires.
>
> 2) flush all writes on any contex that will expire within the lead
> time which needs to be long enough for flushes to take place.
That too is only a partial solution. The GSS context can expire early
due to totally unforeseeable circumstances such as a server reboot, for
instance.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-25 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-07 15:39 Lukas Hejtmanek
2010-05-24 21:24 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-25 12:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-05-25 12:58 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2010-05-25 13:39 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-05-25 14:07 ` Zdenek Salvet
2010-05-25 17:10 ` Sunil Mushran
2010-05-25 13:45 ` William A. (Andy) Adamson
2010-05-25 14:02 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2010-05-25 14:10 ` William A. (Andy) Adamson
2010-05-25 14:29 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-05-25 14:04 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1274796270.5377.48.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=androsadamson@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=salvet@ics.muni.cz \
--cc=xhejtman@ics.muni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®