From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Call update_group_power only for local_group
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:53:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1278626014.2834.74.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1278612989.1900.176.camel@laptop>
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 11:16 -0700, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 10:45 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > > @@ -2433,7 +2433,8 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
> > > return;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - update_group_power(sd, this_cpu);
> > > + if (local_group)
> > > + update_group_power(sd, this_cpu);
> >
> > if IDLE == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE, then all the cpu's in the local group will do
> > this. Also update_group_power() can be done on only on the local cpu,
> > i.e., when this_cpu == smp_processor_id() right?
>
> It might make sense to only update_group_power on !CPU_NEWLY_IDLE and
> rely on the tick driven cpu_power updates.
>
> No sense in updating them in finer slices I guess.
>
> So how about something like:
>
> ---
> kernel/sched_fair.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index 9910e1b..2f05679 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -2427,14 +2427,14 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
> * domains. In the newly idle case, we will allow all the cpu's
> * to do the newly idle load balance.
> */
> - if (idle != CPU_NEWLY_IDLE && local_group &&
> - balance_cpu != this_cpu) {
> - *balance = 0;
> - return;
> + if (idle != CPU_NEWLY_IDLE && local_group) {
> + if (balance_cpu != this_cpu) {
> + *balance = 0;
> + return;
> + }
> + update_group_power(sd, this_cpu);
> }
>
> - update_group_power(sd, this_cpu);
> -
> /* Adjust by relative CPU power of the group */
> sgs->avg_load = (sgs->group_load * SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) / group->cpu_power;
>
I am ok with this patch (barring the currently broken aperf/mperf part).
Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Also, looking at all this, don't we need to do something like this in
the nohz load balance?
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 9910e1b..ae750e9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -3598,6 +3598,7 @@ static void nohz_idle_balance(int this_cpu, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
}
raw_spin_lock_irq(&this_rq->lock);
+ update_rq_clock(this_rq);
update_cpu_load(this_rq);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&this_rq->lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-08 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-01 23:12 Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-07-02 8:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-02 16:20 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-07-02 16:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-02 16:56 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-07-02 17:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-08 14:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-08 17:45 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-08 17:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-08 17:50 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-08 17:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-08 18:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-08 21:53 ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2010-07-09 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-17 11:12 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Update rq->clock for nohz balanced cpus tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2010-07-12 17:11 ` [PATCH] sched: Call update_group_power only for local_group Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-07-17 11:12 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Reduce update_group_power() calls tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1278626014.2834.74.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®