From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Cc: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@linux.intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>,
Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] scsi: Convert struct Scsi_Host->cmd_serial_number to atomic_t
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:46:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285278389.1849.199.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284839878.13344.300.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 12:58 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 21:45 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> > On 09/17/2010 02:03 PM, Joe Eykholt wrote:
> > >
> > > How about instead of adding use_serial_number, let's just have the
> > > drivers that want a serial number call scsi_cmd_get_serial()
> >
> > I think this sounds better.
> >
>
> In that case I will go ahead and add explict scsi_cmd_get_serial() calls
> to the LLDs that use struct scsi_cmnd->serial_number in anything beyond
> an obvious and simple informational purpose.
>
> > You could also convert drivers to the host tagging if you needed a
> > unique id for each command sent to a host.
>
> Hmmm, what does this entail again..?
>
> >
> > > and stop calling it from scsi_dispatch_cmd()? AFAICT, it's only
> > > used in debug messages in some drivers. I didn't find other usages
> > > but didn't do an exhaustive search.
> >
> > The comments for serial_number say that it is only supposed to be used
> > for debugging printks and most drivers use it for that.
>
> So I would suppose it would be OK for those drivers to continue to
> printk serial_number to show the internal serial_number allocation is
> now disabled by default.
>
> > However, it looks like mpt and dpt_i2o are using it for error handling
> > and/or lookup type of operations. I think the mpt* uses are not needed
> > in the abort checks.
> >
>
> In that case, then adding an explict scsi_cmd_get_serial() call in mpt*
> and dpt_i20 ->queuecommand() callers would be a good first step.
>
> > And eata is using it for ordering and tracking or something. It could
> > probably be converted to the host tagging if or what you suggested if it
> > needs the uniqueue id.
>
> Adding an explict scsi_cmd_get_serial() for eata for now, and we can
> consider LLD canidates for host tag conversion as a future step.
>
> >
> > zfcp looks like it copies it. It does not look like the driver needs it.
> >
>
> Ok, I will look at removing it's usage in zfcp or if necessary add an
> the explict scsi_cmd_get_serial() call.
>
> > scsi_error.c uses it in scsi_try_to_abort_cmd to check if a command has
> > completed, but I think that can be done by checking if REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE
> > is set.
>
> Hmmm, good catch here. Jejb and hch, does this item work for you..?
>
> If so then I will take another peek for any ML uses of a struct
> scsi_cmnd->serial_number that need to be addressed, and include Joe's
> and Mike's recommendations into a v3 series.
>
Greetings Mike and Co,
I was doing some followup on these items for a v3 series and started
with a patch following mnc's recommendations for dropping the
scsi_error.c codes depending upon struct scsi_cmnd->serial_number:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
index 1de30eb..f35c127 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
@@ -644,11 +644,7 @@ static int __scsi_try_to_abort_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
*/
static int scsi_try_to_abort_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
{
- /*
- * scsi_done was called just after the command timed out and before
- * we had a chance to process it. (db)
- */
- if (scmd->serial_number == 0)
+ if (test_bit(REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE, &scmd->request->atomic_flags))
return SUCCESS;
return __scsi_try_to_abort_cmd(scmd);
}
and while building I noticed that the simple single enum REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE=0 is
currently located in block/blk.h and along with blk_mark_rq_complete() and
blk_clear_rq_complete() for setting this bit within struct request->atomic_flags.
jens, hch, tejun, and co, do you guys have a preference how this should be handled
so that scsi_try_to_abort_cmd() can use proper atomic struct request bits here and
we can get rid of this (racy..?) method of using struct scsi_cmnd->serial_number
for anything wrt to per struct scsi_cmnd context timeout handling.
Thanks!
--nab
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-23 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-17 18:21 Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-17 19:03 ` Joe Eykholt
2010-09-17 19:33 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-18 2:45 ` Mike Christie
2010-09-18 2:56 ` Mike Christie
2010-09-18 19:57 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-23 21:46 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
2010-09-24 6:32 ` Jens Axboe
2010-09-24 18:33 ` Mike Anderson
2010-09-24 20:57 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-25 2:31 ` Mike Christie
2010-09-24 20:41 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-27 14:05 ` Christof Schmitt
2010-09-27 23:02 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-28 8:11 ` [PATCH] zfcp: Remove scsi_cmnd->serial_number from debug traces Christof Schmitt
2010-09-29 7:52 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-28 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] scsi: Convert struct Scsi_Host->cmd_serial_number to atomic_t Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1285278389.1849.199.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org \
--to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@emulex.com \
--cc=jeykholt@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vasu.dev@linux.intel.com \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®