From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: Mike Anderson <andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@linux.intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>,
Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] scsi: Convert struct Scsi_Host->cmd_serial_number to atomic_t
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:57:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285361872.1849.249.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100924183305.GA15128@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 11:33 -0700, Mike Anderson wrote:
> Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> > On 2010-09-23 23:46, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 12:58 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 21:45 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
<SNIP>
> > > Greetings Mike and Co,
> > >
> > > I was doing some followup on these items for a v3 series and started
> > > with a patch following mnc's recommendations for dropping the
> > > scsi_error.c codes depending upon struct scsi_cmnd->serial_number:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> > > index 1de30eb..f35c127 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> > > @@ -644,11 +644,7 @@ static int __scsi_try_to_abort_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> > > */
> > > static int scsi_try_to_abort_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> > > {
> > > - /*
> > > - * scsi_done was called just after the command timed out and before
> > > - * we had a chance to process it. (db)
> > > - */
> > > - if (scmd->serial_number == 0)
> > > + if (test_bit(REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE, &scmd->request->atomic_flags))
> > > return SUCCESS;
> > > return __scsi_try_to_abort_cmd(scmd);
> > > }
> > >
> > > and while building I noticed that the simple single enum
> > > REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE=0 is
> >
> > > currently located in block/blk.h and along with blk_mark_rq_complete()
> > > and blk_clear_rq_complete() for setting this bit within struct
> > > request->atomic_flags.
> > >
> > > jens, hch, tejun, and co, do you guys have a preference how this
> > > should be handled so that scsi_try_to_abort_cmd() can use proper
> > > atomic struct request bits here and we can get rid of this (racy..?)
> > > method of using struct scsi_cmnd->serial_number for anything wrt to
> > > per struct scsi_cmnd context timeout handling.
> >
> > Just add a
> >
> > static inline int blk_test_rq_complete(struct request *rq)
> > {
> > return test_bit(REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE, &rq->atomic_flags);
> > }
> >
> > in block/blk.h
> >
> > I need this too for some lockless completion patches I am playing with.
>
Greetings Mike,
> In reviewing the current code paths wasn't the serial_number also used to
> avoid calling __scsi_try_to_abort_cmd for START_UNIT case also.
Not sure on this item, but checking on this now..
>
> If we skip __scsi_try_to_abort_cmd when REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE is set it would
> be correct for the scsi_decide_disposition cases but it would appear this
> would stop __scsi_try_to_abort_cmd from being called in the time out
> case as REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE is set prior to calling blk_rq_timed_out.
Hmmmmmmm..
>
> 1.) Request timed out path to scsi_eh_scmd_add.
>
> blk_rq_timed_out_timer
> ...
> if (blk_mark_rq_complete(rq))
> continue;
> blk_rq_timed_out
> q->rq_timed_out_fn "scsi_times_out"
> scsi_times_out
> scsi_eh_scmd_add
>
> 2.) Request completion path to scsi_eh_scmd_add based on
> scsi_decide_disposition disposition set to FAILED (actually
> scsi_eh_scmd_add called from the default case with the disposition of
> FAILED appearing to be the only disposition returned that would hit this
> case vs. the other three handled cases). This should not be a common path
> outside of handling allow_restart.
>
> blk_complete_request
> ...
> if (!blk_mark_rq_complete(req))
> __blk_complete_request
> ...
> raise_softirq_irqoff(BLOCK_SOFTIRQ);
> blk_done_softirq
> rq->q->softirq_done_fn "scsi_softirq_done"
> scsi_softirq_done
> scsi_eh_scmd_add
>
> 3.) Call path to scsi_try_to_abort_cmd.
> scsi_error_handler
> scsi_unjam_host
> scsi_eh_abort_cmds
> scsi_try_to_abort_cmd
> Thanks,
>
Ok, what I think is being said here is that the usage of
blk_test_rq_complete() in scsi_try_to_abort_cmd() completly breaks
__scsi_try_to_abort_cmd from being called from within the struct request
timeout handler, right..?
Not being exquistiely fimilar with the scsi_error.c generic LLD logic w/
struct request timeouts code, I assume this means we need to revisit
scsi_unjam_host() once again to take into account the new
blk_test_rq_complete() calls from the normal fast path block softirq in
order to be able to handle the individual struct request timeout cases
for outstanding struct scsi_cmnd when they individual timer contexts
fire.
Perhaps we should be setting another bit in struct request->atomic_flags
to signal the REQ_BLKSOFTIRQ_COMPLETE to let scsi_unjam_host() know what
is going on..?
Thanks for your comments Mike!
--nab
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-24 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-17 18:21 Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-17 19:03 ` Joe Eykholt
2010-09-17 19:33 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-18 2:45 ` Mike Christie
2010-09-18 2:56 ` Mike Christie
2010-09-18 19:57 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-23 21:46 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-24 6:32 ` Jens Axboe
2010-09-24 18:33 ` Mike Anderson
2010-09-24 20:57 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
2010-09-25 2:31 ` Mike Christie
2010-09-24 20:41 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-27 14:05 ` Christof Schmitt
2010-09-27 23:02 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-28 8:11 ` [PATCH] zfcp: Remove scsi_cmnd->serial_number from debug traces Christof Schmitt
2010-09-29 7:52 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-28 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] scsi: Convert struct Scsi_Host->cmd_serial_number to atomic_t Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1285361872.1849.249.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org \
--to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@emulex.com \
--cc=jeykholt@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vasu.dev@linux.intel.com \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®